Even
small possession is harmful:
391. Non renunciation of even
single Parigrah (possession) does not result in pure disposition and without
purification of the mind, how can the Sadhu be free of karmas?
Comments:
There are 14 types of internal and 10 types of external possessions. If even
one of them is not discarded then the purity of mind is not attained and bondage
is assured.
Status
of Muni wearing loin cloth:
392. The Sanyami Muni ( Muni
who has renounced all possessions) who says “ it is permitted in scriptures”
and wears a piece of cloth, he can never be independent and violence free.
Comment:
While for a shravak a loin cloth is acceptable, it is not so for a Muni. He
cannot be possession free even if he wears a string.
Status
of Sadhu possessing clothes-utensils:
393. How can the impurity of
mind and culpability of Sadhu be prevented who accepts utensils, clothes and
other (blanket etc.) possessions definitely?
Comment:
All possessions are said to be detrimental to attainment of shuddhopayoga of
higher order.
Possessions
lead to instability of mind :
394. The sadhu who indulges in
acceptance-possession, usage-protection, washing-drying of clothes-utensils etc., the impurity of his
mind cannot be eliminated.
The one
obsessive of possessions cannot worship
the soul:
395. Managing the activities of
clothes, utensils etc. how can the violence, non-restraints and attachment be
prevented? It is not possible. Therefore how can the attainment of own soul be
possible for the sadhu who is attached to other dravyas ? It is not possible.
Comment:
So long as one believes other dravyas as beneficial and cause for comfort, the
Jiva cannot achieve purity of mind expected at that level of Munihood.
Form of
acceptable possessions:
396. Knowing
his own dravya, kshetra, kaal, bhava properly the Sadhu should indulge in those
external possessions which do not cause any blemish on his conduct.
Comment: Two types of paths are described. The ideal one is remaining within shuddhopayoga called Utsarg Marg. The other is named Apavad Marg ( path with exceptions) in which four things are permitted as per Pravachansar gatha 225- The body, guru’s teachings, study of Shastra and obeisance towards other followers of same path.
Possessions
not permitted:
397. The sadhu who is engaged
in conduct beneficial to himself, should not accept any such item which may be
detrimental to his sanyam, which may lead to thoughts pertaining to ownership
or objects which are desired by non
sanyami continuously.
Form of
Sadhu desirous of Moksha:
398. Those Sadhus desirous of
only Moksha, are detached towards their own bodies also. Hence the Muniraj who
practices the possessionlessness
mahavrita does not accept even a small external possession.
Question
pertaining to the Jina ling for women:
399. The Veetrag Dharma which
is preached by Jinendra does not involve doing anything with expectations of
this loka or the other loka ( current birth or next birth), how come in that
Jina dharma the women are required to keep possessions (clothes etc.) ?
Comment:
In this Gatha a question has been asked that when dharma is practiced without
expectations of this loka or next loka then how come the women have been asked
to practice with possessions? This has been answered in next few gathas.
Since
one does not attain salvation in women
form:
400. Since women cannot attain
Moksha with the birth in women form ;
knowing this Jinendra deva has recommended conduct suitable for their gender.
Next
reason –excessive Pramad in women:
401. Since women have excessive
lack of control, they are declared to be Pramada. Due to this they cannot
attain salvation.
Next
reason- presence of excessive Moha in
women:
402. Since their minds are
occupied with attachment, fear, jealousy, deceit, depression, sorrow etc.
therefore they cannot attain salvation in this women birth.
Another
reason- Definite presence of faults:
403. Since women cannot be without some of the
above described faults and further by nature their organs are uncovered hence
it has been arranged to cover them with clothes.
Another
reason- Inability to practice restraints:
404-405 . Further the bodies of
women have weariness, menstruation, periods, fickle mindedness and in their
organs- underarms, yoni, breasts birth of
minute Labdhi Aparyapta (incomplete)
humans keep taking place in large quantity due to which they cannot
attain total restraints.
Inability
to practice Digamber form:
406. Those women who have
attained Samyak darshan with purity like moon and are experts in proper conduct
as per Jina ling described in
scriptures, they also undertake austerity
for purification of soul in dressed form (They cannot practice Digamber
form).
Men
worthy of accepting Jina Ling:
407. Those men who are
peaceful, capable of undertaking austerity, free of all blemishes, having one
of the three forms- Brahman, Kshatriya, Vaishya by birth, possessing a healthy body free of diseases with proper
and proportionate body parts; they are considered to be worthy of accepting
Jina Ling.
Obstacles
in acceptance of Jina Ling:
408. Inappropriate race,
family, age , indulgence in wrong acts, poor intelligence , high degree of
anger etc. are all obstructive for acceptance of Jina Ling. Opposite to these
the proper race, family etc. are suitable for acceptance of the Ling.
Real
form of obstacles:
409. In reality, the cause due
to which the jewel trio form dharma for
attaining Moksha of a Sadhu gets destroyed, that is called obstruction. There
is no other obstruction for attaining salvation separately.
Obstacles
remain obstacles for ever:
410. Those practical
obstructions which have been declared earlier for accepting Jina Ling do not
become non-obstructions for acceptance of Sallekhana (Samadhi Maran).
Comment:
The reasons due to which Jina ling was not accepted cannot be overruled at the
time of death to accept Sallekhana.
Form of
Shraman:
411. Those who do not have any
expectations from the present loka and the next loka , who are equipped with
appropriate conduct pertaining to food- movements and possess equanimity, those
great people are Shramans (Munis).
Form of
Apramatta Anahari Shraman:
412-413. Those who are
disinterested in passions, gossip, sleep, ragas and sensual subjects; who
retain equanimity in birth-death, friend-foe and happiness-unhappiness; who are
always in search of their own soul ( for enhancement of purity); who are
non-desirous of alms/food and always
remain composed; such Shraman Sadhus have been called “Anahari”.
Form of
Sadhu having only body as possession:
414. Those who do not make any
efforts for the maintenance of the body and without hiding their own
capabilities, who are always engaged in austerity; those are Sadhus(Shramans)
having possession of just the body only.
Form of
food taken by Muniraj:
415. Those muniraj having just
body as possession, undertake sustenance at an unknown residence as a rule.
That sustenance is received as alms, undesired in nature, less than what is
required, once in a day, without containing blemishes like meat or liquor etc.,
tasteless- without containing taste like sweet etc.
Fault
in taking meat:
416-417. Whether the meat is
raw or cooked or being cooked , Jinendra Deva has told of the continuous
generation of Nigod jivas within it having the same class as that of the meat.
Hence he who even touches this raw or cooked meat or eats it, he definitely is
the cause for the death of millions of Jivas.
The
great fault in consuming honey:
418. Honey is by nature
generated by death of several Jivas and that honey is also place for birth-death of numerous jivas. Hence
sadhus fearful of the restraints, give up consumption of honey with mind-speech-body.
Other
non-consumable item:
419. Sadhus disinterested in
food give up bulbs, roots, fruits, flowers, leaves, butter etc. inedible items
and other nonacceptable food items with mind-speech-body and
krita-kaarit-anumodana ( doing- getting it done- seconding the deed by others).
Food
accepted in the hands of Muniraj cannot be given to others:
420. Blemish-free food received
by the Muniraj in the hands from the donors is not suitable for being given to someone else. If the Muniraj
gives the food received in the hands to someone else then he should not take
any more food. If the Muniraj gives away the received food in hands to someone else and continues to take more
food himself then he is responsible for fault.
Comment:
If they give away the food to someone else then they are guilty of having
possession of food hence Aparigrah Vrita is violated. Further by giving food
they become like a householder.