Ninth Chapter
Form of Moksha Marg
Now the form
of Moksha Marg is described-
Earlier ‘the
form of Mithya darshan’, opponent of Moksha Marga was described; they should be
renounced knowing them to be dukh form and cause for dukh, thus being
despicable and later the form of Upadesh
was told, knowing which the Upadesh should be rightly understood.
Now ‘the
form of Samyak Darshan etc.’ Marg of Moksha is being shown; knowing them to be
sukh form and cause for sukh, being venerable , they should be adopted , since
the benediction of soul is in Moksha only; the means for which is ‘duty of
soul’ hence upadesh for the same is being given here-
Benefit of soul is in
Moksha only
The benefit
of soul is in Moksha only and nothing else- how to decide this ? This is told-
In the soul
different types of guna-paryaya form
states are found; some states do not do any good or bad for the soul; with
states of sukh-dukh only there is benefit or harm ; for that no example is
required here; directly this can be realised.
All the jivas of the lok have only one goal that
dukh should not happen and sukh be attained. Hence all the efforts are made with this objective only;
there is no other objective. The nimitta due to which they perceive occurrence of dukh, they make
efforts to remove it and the nimitta due
to which they perceive occurrence of sukh, they make efforts for its
attainment. The expansion-contraction etc. form all states also occur in the
soul only and conjunction of several other dravyas is also attained but no one
makes any effort for removal or attainment of things by which dukh-sukh are not
seen to happen.
Know such is the nature of Atma Dravya .
All other
states it can tolerate but it cannot tolerate dukh only. What can it do when
dukh is under influence of others? He suffers it but under own control he does
not tolerate even a small amount of dukh while whatever be the states of
expansion-contraction; he undergoes them with own control . There is no
argument with the nature. Such is the nature of soul.
Look! When
unhappy he wishes to sleep, in sleeping
the gyan etc. become weak hence by becoming like insentient , he wishes to
eliminate dukh. Or he wishes to die; there in death he considers it as own
destruction but even by losing own
existence he wishes to remove dukh. Thus elimination of one dukh form paryaya only is his objective.
Absence of
dukh only is sukh since dukh has characteristics of perturbations and its
absence has sukh of the characteristics of non perturbations- this too is
directly perceived.
Externally
conjunction of whichever thing is attained; the one who has perturbations
internally within, he is unhappy only. The one who does not have perturbations,
he is happy. The perturbations occur due
to presence of ragas etc. Kashaya bhavas since with ragas etc. bhavas he wishes to make dravyas manifest
in different way. If those dravyas manifest in some other way , then he gets perturbed.
The perturbations can be eliminated either by
removal of own ragas etc. or by the manifestation of all dravyas as desired by
self , but all dravyas are not under his control.
Sometimes
some dravya manifests the way he has desired, even then his perturbations do
not get resolved completely. If
all deeds occur in accordance with his desire; or they do not happen, then he
may be unperturbed , but it cannot happen , since the manifestation of any
dravya is not under control of any other dravya, hence with the elimination of
own ragas etc. bhavas only non-perturbation occurs- thus only this can be accomplished.
The ragas etc. bhavas are not natural bhavas of soul, they are Aupadhik bhavas,
caused by nimitta of others and that nimitta is fruition of Moha karma; with
its elimination , all ragas etc. bhavas can be destroyed, then with destruction
of perturbation , dukh gets eliminated and sukh is attained; hence destruction
of Moha karma is beneficial.
The assisting cause of the perturbation is
fruition of Gyanavarana etc. (Ghati karmas).
With the
fruition of Gyanavarana-Darshanavarana, the gyan-darshan are not
revealed completely ; hence the restlessness of seeing-knowing is felt or the
real nature of complete substance is not known, then being ragas etc. form he
manifests which causes perturbation.
With
fruition of Antaraya, the activities of daan (charity) etc. cannot be
carried out as desired, then restlessness occurs.
In this way
they fructify. With fruition of Moha karma , they become assisting
causes for generation of perturbations. With the destruction of fruition of
Moha, they do not have strength and in AntarMuhurta kaal they get destroyed on
their own. With elimination of assisting causes the perturbation free state is
revealed. Thus Keval Gyani Bhagwan is said to have attained infinite blissful
state.
And with the nimitta of fruition of Aghati karmas
, the conjunction of body etc. is attained.
With the
fruition of Moha karma, the conjunction of body etc. become external assisting
causes for perturbations. With fruition of internal moha, ragas etc. occur and
with fruition of external aghati karmas, due to ragas etc., the conjunction of
body etc. are attained, then restlessness is produced.
And with the
destruction of fruition of Moha also, the fruition of Aghati karmas continues
but it cannot generate restlessness at
all. Earlier it was assisting cause for restlessness; hence the destruction of
Aghati karmas is desirable only to the soul. For Kevali , with their
presence there is no dukh hence there is no effort for their destruction also
but with the destruction of Moha these karmas
get destroyed on their own in a short while.
In this way the destruction of all karmas is
beneficial to soul and the destruction of all karmas only is called as Moksha ;
hence the benevolence of soul lies in Moksha only and nothing else-decide thus.
Here
someone says- In
worldly state with fruition of punya karmas also the jiva gets to be sukhi;
hence why do you call only Moksha to be beneficial ?
Its
reply- In worldly
state the sukh is absolutely not there; dukh only exists but someone has
sometimes lot of dukh and someone has sometimes less dukh; hence earlier lot of
dukh was there and other jivas are found to have lot of dukh , in comparison to
them the one with less dukh is called sukhi and with such intent only the one
with less dukh considers himself to be sukhi. In reality there is no Sukh. If
that small dukh also remains at all times then also it can be called beneficial
but even that does not happen. For sometime only the fruition of punya is
there, where dukh is less, later dukh becomes more; hence the worldly state is
not benevolent.
For example
– someone has fever; sometimes the Asata is more and sometimes it is less; when
Asata is less then he considers himself as well. People also say that he is
alright but in reality so long as presence of fever is there, till then he is
not alright; in the same way the fruition of Moha is there for the worldly jiva
; sometimes the perturbation is more , sometimes less. When restlessness is less then he considers
self to be sukhi. People also say – he is sukhi, but in reality so long as
presence of Moha is there, he is not sukhi.
And Listen! In worldly state also the reduction of
perturbation is called sukh; increase of perturbation is called dukh; the
sukh-dukh is not due to any external object.
For example
– some poor person attained some money, there due to reduction of perturbation
he is called sukhi and he also considers self to be sukhi. But some very rich
person lost some money, there due to increase of perturbation he is called
dukhi and he also considers self as dukhi. Know the same elsewhere.
Look! The increasing-decreasing of restlessness is
not in accordance with external substances; it is in accordance with the
increase-decrease of Kashaya bhavas. For example – someone has little money and he is satisfied
then he has little restlessness and someone has lot of money and he is desirous
of more hence his restlessness is more. Someone called somebody lots of bad
things and he did not get angry then he does not become restless while one may
get angry with little things itself then his restlessness is more.
For example
the cow has no objective with the calf
but Moha is intense; hence she is quite
restless to protect it. Whereas the warrior can do lots of things with the body
but in the war on account of pride etc. loses the moha with the body etc. hence he is not perturbed even
to die.
Hence
know thus- in the
worldly state with increase-decrease of perturbation only sukh-dukh are
considered and the increase-decrease of perturbation is in accordance with the
increase-decrease of ragas etc. Kashaya.
There the sukh-dukh are not dependent upon the
external paraphernalia.
On account of Kashaya the desire is generated and in accordance with the desire
the external materials are obtained, then with
the subsidence of his Kashaya, the restlessness decreases, then he
considers it as sukh and if the materials as desired are not obtained then with
increase of Kashaya the restlessness increases and he considers it as dukh.
Although it is this way only, but he believes that my sukh-dukh are attained
with the nimitta of other dravya, but such belief is delusion only.
Hence
consider this- in worldly state with slight reduction of Kashaya, if it is
believed to be sukh and beneficial, then with the complete eradication of
Kashaya and elimination of causes of Kashaya, with supreme non perturbation infinite sukh is attained-
why should such Moksha state not be considered as beneficial?
In worldly state, even if higher status is
attained, even then either the restlessness of collecting sensory materials is
felt or the perturbation of sensory enjoyments is felt or if self has some
desire generated due to some anger etc. Kashaya then the restlessness for its
fulfilment is present . At no time he is completely perturbation free; in the
intent different types of restlessness continues. And if some external effort
is made for elimination of restlessness then firstly the objective is not met
and even if per chance the objective is met, immediately he gets engaged in
efforts for elimination of another restlessness.
In the way the restlessness for eliminating
restlessness always continues. If this restlessness is not there then why does he engage in activities
of new sensory enjoyments continuously? Therefore in worldly state, in spite of attainment of
Indra-Ahmindra states with fruition of punya, the restlessness is not
eliminated ; he remains unhappy; hence worldly state is not beneficial.
And in
Moksha state, any form of restlessness has not remained ; hence there is no
objective of making efforts for elimination of restlessness. At all times he
remains sukhi with peaceful spirit. Hence Moksha state only is beneficial.
Earlier also the dukh of the worldly state and sukh of the Moksha state were
specially described, that is for the same purpose; considering that , knowing Moksha to be beneficial,
make efforts for Moksha- the essence of all the Upadesh is this much only.
Moksha attainment is with
Purushartha only
Question- Are the efforts for Moksha carried
out upon attainment of Kaal Labdhi depending upon the Bhavitavya ( destiny) or
they occur with attainment of Upasham (subsidence) of Moha etc. or they occur
with efforts of own Purushartha , tell this? If they happen upon attainment of
first two reasons then why give us upadesh? And if they occur due to
purushartha then of the many people listening to Upadesh , some can make the
effort and some cannot; what is the reason for the same?
Its
reply- In completion
of one deed, several reasons are involved. When the efforts for Moksha is
carried out, there all the three reasons given above are involved and when
efforts are not made, then all the three reasons are not fulfilled. In the
above three reasons-
Kaal Labdhi and Honhaar ( destiny) are nothing ;
the kaal at which the deed is accomplished, that is Kaal Labdhi and the deed
which was accomplished, that is Honhaar (destiny).
The Upasham of karmas etc. are power of pudgala ;
soul is not doer-destroyer of them.
Those who make efforts with purushartha – that is
deed of soul ; hence soul is given upadesh for making efforts with
purushartha.
When this soul
makes efforts using such means that the deed is surely accomplished;
then the other reasons are also fulfilled and the accomplishment of the task is
also carried out.
And using such means that the accomplishment of
the deed may or may not happen; if the efforts are made with such means, then if other reasons are
available then the deed is accomplished; if they are not available then the
deed is not fulfilled.
In Jina faith the means for Moksha are described-
with them Moksha is surely attained; hence if some jiva carries out efforts
using purushartha in accordance with the Upadesh of Jineshwara, his kaal labdhi
and Honhaar have been attained and upasham
of karmas etc. have been attained then only he makes such efforts; hence
the one who makes efforts with purushartha for Moksha, for him all reasons are
fulfilled- be sure of this and he definitely attains Moksha.
And the Jiva
who does not make efforts for Moksha with purushartha, his kaal labdhi and
Honhaar have not been attained and the Upasham etc. of karmas have not happened
yet hence he does not make those efforts; there fore the one who does not make
efforts for moksha with purushartha, he does not fulfil any reason- be sure of
this and he does not attain Moksha.
He says- Everyone listens to the Upadesh but
someone makes efforts for Moksha and someone does not, what is the reason for
it?
The reason is this only- Those who carry out
purushartha after listening to Upadesh, they can make efforts for Moksha and
those who do not do purushartha , they cannot make efforts for Moksha.
Upadesh is only education; the result is based
upon purushartha.
Question- The DravyaLingi Muni, for attaining
Moksha, giving up householder state engages in Tapa etc., there he performed
the purushartha but deed was not accomplished; therefore purushartha did not
accomplish the objective?
Its
reply- How can
result be accomplished if the purushartha is different? In Tapa etc. form
Vyavahara means he engages with interest whose result is told as Shubha bandh
in shastras and he wishes to attain Moksha with it , how can it be? – this is
delusion.
Question- The cause for delusion is also karma
only; what can purushartha do?
Its
reply- With decision
based upon right Upadesh, the delusion gets eliminated but he does not do such
purushartha, for that reason the delusion remains. If he carries out
purushartha for taking decision then the Moha karma which is cause for delusion
also subsides etc. , then delusion gets eliminated since the manifestations
engaged in decision are pure and with that the duration-intensity of Moha
reduce.
Question- Upayoga does not get engaged in
taking decision , its reason is also karma only?
Its
reply- In Ekendriya
etc. there is no capability to think, for them karma only is the reason. This
person has capability to decide due to kshayopasham of Gyanavarana, where he
applies Upayoga, he can decide that but he applies his upayoga in deciding
other things, does not apply upayoga here- this is his fault ; karma does not
have any role.
Question-
Moha is the
destroyer of Samyaktva and Charitra ; without its elimination how can efforts
for Moksha be carried out?
Its
reply- He does not
apply his upayoga in taking decision of Tattva – this is his fault only. When
with purushartha he applies his upayoga in deciding the Tattva, then
automatically with absence of Moha,
purushartha of efforts for Samyaktva etc. form Moksha are carried out. Hence primarily apply
purushartha in engaging upayoga for deciding the Tattva. The Upadesh is
also given for carrying out the same Purushartha. With this purushartha the
purushartha of efforts for Moksha would automatically be accomplished.
And in not
carrying out decision of Tattva, there is no fault of karma; its your own fault
but you wish to remain great and own faults you attribute to karmas; but if you
follow Jina order then such wrong tenet
is not possible. You
wish to remain engaged in sensory
subjects and Kashaya form; hence you speak lies. If the desire for Moksha is
there then why should such arguments be put forth?
In the
worldly activities, even if the
objective is not attained with purushartha , even then he continues to do
purushartha and here he has lost purushartha; hence he calls Moksha as supreme
based upon say-so ; by recognising its nature he does not know it as
beneficial. Knowing it as beneficial if he makes the required efforts then it
is impossible not to be successful.
Here
question- What you
told is true, but with fruition of dravya karma, bhava karma occurs; with bhava
karma the bandh of dravya karma occurs. Again with its fruition bhava karma
occurs- such is the eternal tradition; there how can the efforts for moksha be
carried out?
Its
reply- If the bandh
and fruition of karma remains the same at every time then it would be so, but
due to nimitta of manifestations, with the Utkarshan-Apakarshan-Sankraman (increase-decrease-transformation) etc. of
earlier bonded karmas their capability keeps reducing -increasing ; hence their
fruition also keeps being weak and strong, with their Nimita the new bandh is
also weak- strong.
Hence with
the nimitta of weak-strong fruition of karmas, sometimes gyana etc. are more
and sometimes they are less; sometimes ragas etc. are weak and sometimes they
are strong.
In this way the changes keep occurring.
Sometimes
per chance he attained paryaya of
sangyi-panchendriya paryapta , then the capability to consider by mind was
attained. Sometimes his ragas are strong and sometimes weak. With strong
fruition of raga, the tendency is there of engaging in activities of sensory
subjects and Kashaya only. And with weak fruition of ragas , if the nimitta of
external upadesh etc. is available and self engages in purushartha directing
the Upayoga towards those Upadesh etc. then dharma activities may be performed
. If nimitta is not there and himself he does not carry out purushartha then he
engages in other activities only with weak ragas etc., hence at this occasion the Upadesh is beneficial.
The
ekendriya etc. are without capability of thinking who do not have gyan of
understanding the Upadesh and the Upayoga of jivas with strong ragas etc. does
not engage in Upadesh ; hence those jivas who are having capability of thinking
and whose ragas etc. are weak , they may be able to attain dharma with the
nimitta of upadesh hence they would be benefited; hence at this occasion the purushartha is effective.
Ekendriya
etc. are incapable of engaging in dharma activities, how can they do purushartha
? And those with strong Kashaya , even if they engages in purushartha, it is
that of pap only; they cannot do purushartha of dharma activitiy.
Hence those who are having capability of thinking
and whose ragas etc. are weak- such jiva, engaging in purushartha, with the
nimitta of upadesh, engage upayoga in deciding upon tattva and if the upayoga
gets engrossed there then they would be benefited. If they do not engage in
purushartha of deciding the tattva at this occasion also , waste kaal with
carelessness- either they engage in activities of sensory subjects and Kashaya
with weak ragas etc. or they engage in activities of Vyavahara dharma, then the
occasion would be lost and it would
result in worldly travel only.
At this occasion those jivas who practice engaging
Upayoga in tattva decision by means of purushartha , their purity enhances;
which results in weakening the capability of karmas. Within some period the
Upasham of Darshan Moha occurs by itself
and the right realisation of Tattvas is attained.
Hence his duty is practice of Tattva decision
only, with that the upasham of Darshan moha occurs on its own ; in that jiva
does not have any role.
With its
attainment, the jiva attains Samyak Darshan automatically and with Samyak
Darshan the shraddhan is attained that ‘ I am soul , I do not engage in ragas
etc.’ , but with the fruition of charitra moha ragas etc. occur . If the
fruition is strong then he engages in sensory subjects and if it is weak
then with his purushartha he engages
Upayoga in dharma activities and Vairagya bhavana. With its nimitta the
charitra moha keeps weakening – with that the purushartha of adopting Desh
Charitra and Sakal Charitra gets revealed.
Later
adopting Charitra, with his purushartha he enhances the manifestation in
dharma, there with purity the capability of karmas gets weakened and purity
enhances which causes reduction of karma capability even further.
In this way
sequentially he destroys Moha, then all
manifestations become totally pure; with them the destruction of Gyanavarana
etc. occur, then Keval Gyan gets revealed.
Later
without efforts, destroying aghati karmas , he attains Shuddha siddha state. – thus with the nimitta of upadesh
if jiva engages in own purushartha then karmas get destroyed.
When the
fruition of karmas is strong, then purushartha is not possible; he may fall
from the upper gunasthanas also ; there depending upon destiny things happen;
but where fruition is weak and purushartha is possible, then one should not be
careless and being alert complete the task.
For example-
some person is flowing in the stream of river; if the water flow is strong then
his purushartha would not be able to do anything, Upadesh is also ineffective.
When the flow of water is less and if he carries out purushartha then he can
come out, he only is told to come out and if he does not come out then he
continues to flow slowly and when the
flow is stronger then he continues to flow.
In the same
way jiva is traversing in the world; there if the fruition of karmas is strong,
then his purushartha would be ineffective, Upadesh also does not help. When the
fruition of karmas is weak, then if he carries out purushartha and engages in
Moksha Marga then he can attain Moksha; he only is given upadesh of Moksha Marg and if he
does not engage in Moksha Marg then he
attains some purity and later with
fruition being strong, he attains paryaya of Nigod etc. also.
Hence it is not right to miss the opportunity !
Now the opportunity has arrived in every way- getting such opportunity is
difficult; hence shri guru with compassion gives upadesh of Moksha Marg; the
bhavya jivas should proceed in that.
Continued…..