The
commentator narrates the same in Kalash form-
Shloka 4: Nishchaya
and Vyavahara- the subjects of these two nayas are mutually contradictory; that
contradiction is erased by the words of Jina Bhagwan which are indicated with
‘Syat’ term. Those people who practice them with keen interest, they themselves
abandon the fruition of Mithyatva Karma and
immediately see the Atma in grand supremely illuminated jyoti form. That Samaysar form
Shuddha Atma is not produced new; but earlier it was obscured with karmas which
has now become explicitly revelation form. And it does not get divided by the
absolute ekant form stands of Kunaya
(bad naya), it is hindrance free.
Bhavartha – Jina
vani is Syadvad form. Where two nayas have contradiction in subjects, e.g. the
one which is sovereignty form that does not become non sovereignty form, the
one which is one that does not become many, the one which is Nitya does not
become Anitya, the one which is divisions form that does not become undivided
form, the one which is Shuddha that does not become Ashuddha etc. – there by means of Jina vani
that in certain aspects the thing is existent in Sovereign- Non Sovereign form,
one-many form, Nitya-Anitya form, Divided-Undivided form – describing thus the
contradiction is reconciled, untrue imagination is not carried out. In the Jina
vani, in Dravyarthika and Paryayarthika both nayas, out of necessity treating Shuddha
Dravyarthika naya as primary it is called as Nishchaya and the Ashuddha Dravyarthika form
Paryayarthika naya is treated insignificant to describe Vyavahara. In such Jina
words those people who engross, they attain the Shuddha atma in reality – others
totally ekantvadi Samkhya etc. followers cannot attain it, since the thing is
not subject of absolute Ekant side, even then accepting only one dharma only
they imagine the thing in unreal form- which is untrue, hence they are Mithya
Drishti with hindrance.
-
In
this way the introduction was carried out in twelve gathas.
Now Acharya
describes the form of Nishchaya Samyaktva with Shuddha naya as primary. In the
primacy of Ashuddha naya ( vyavahara naya) the shraddhan of jivas etc. Tattavs
is declared as Samyaktva, whereas here knowing those Jivas etc. tattvas by
means of Shuddha naya results in Samyaktva, this is told. The commentator
authors three shlokas for informing the same. In the first shloka it is told that although Vyavahara naya is
called as meaningful in some respect, even then it is not of much use –
Shloka 5. In
the first stage till the attainment of Shuddha nature is not accomplished, till
then the Vyavahara naya is called as hand support to such people who have put
their first step on this path. Even then to those people who observe the
subject of Shuddha naya form supreme ‘Arth’ within themselves which is
Chaitanya marvel form devoid of bhavas of other dravyas, have belief in the
same, and engrossing in that form they attain charitra bhava, for them this
Vyavahara naya is not at all meaningful.
Bhavartha: With
gyan, shraddhan and Acharan of Shuddha nature, the Ashuddha naya is of no use.
Now the form
of Nishchaya Samyaktva is told-
Shloka 6: Observing
this Atma as different from other dravyas only is Samyak Darshan as a rule. This Atma is pervasive within own
Guna-Paryayas and by means of Shuddha naya it is established to be in Ekatva
form and it is complete block of Gyan.
The Atma is same form as Samyak darshan hence Acharya prays that ‘renouncing
the tradition of nine Tattvas, one Atma alone
be attained by us .”
Bhavartha : This
Atma, which is pervasive within all natural and Naimittik states form
guna-paryaya divisions, has been declared to be in ekatva form from aspect of
Shuddha naya. From aspect of Shuddha naya the gyayak alone is shown to have
singular shape, observing it to be different from all other dravyas and bhavas
of other dravyas; having such shraddhan is Samyak darshan as a rule. The
Vyavahara naya calling the Atma as several divisions form describes the Samyak
darshan to be several divisions form, there anomaly exists and rule does not
prevail. Upon reaching the border of Shuddha naya the anomaly does not remain
hence it becomes rule form. The Atma,
subject of Shuddha naya is complete block of gyan – gyan natured knowing all the Lokalok. Samyak darshan
is shraddhan form of such Atma. This is not a different substance, it is
manifestation of Atma only. Hence it is Atma only. Therefore the Samyak Darshan
is Atma, nothing else. Here it should be understood specially that the naya is
part of Shruta Praman, hence Shuddha naya is also part of Shruta praman. The
Shruta Praman is Paroksh ( indirect) ,
since the thing is known by means of words of Agam of omniscient; hence this
Shuddha naya is different from all dravyas, pervasive in all the paryayas of
Atma, complete Chaitanya Keval gyan form –shows
the extraordinary Chaitanya dharma knower of all Lokalok in Paroksh way.
When this Chhadmastha jiva follower of Vyavahara, deciding Agam as Praman,
carries out shraddhan of complete Atma shown with Shuddha naya, then such
shraddhan is Nishchaya Samyak darshan. So long as the Shraddhan of Jiva etc.
divisions form Tattvas subject of Vyavahara naya only is there, till then
Nishchaya Samyak darshan is not attained. Hence Acharya says that renouncing
the chain of nine tattvas, the subject of Shuddha naya form one atma alone be
attained by us; we do not wish anything
else. This is prayer of Veetrag state, it is not naya perspective. If
only nayas are always sided with, then it is Mithyatva only. Here someone enquires that Atma is Chaitanya , if that
much alone is experienced then whether
that much shraddha is Samyak darshan or not? The answer is- leaving apart nastiks all other faith followers
believe Atma to be Chaitanya alone; if that shraddha alone be called Samyak
darshan then all would be established to have Samyak darshan. Hence only by
having shraddhan of complete atma as described in the vani of omniscient, with
such shraddhan only nishchaya samyaktva is attained, this should be
understood.
Now the
commentator Acharya tells in the following shloka that ‘then the Atma Jyoti,
different from all dravyas get revealed which is under control of Shuddha naya’-
Shloka 7: Subsequently
different Atma Jyoti under control of Shudha naya gets revealed which does not
forgo its oneness in spite of being existent in Nine Tattvas.
Bhavartha: Atma
in the states of nine Tattvas is seen in several forms; if its different nature
is considered then it does not forgo its Chaitanya chamatkar (miraculous) Jyoti
form.
Tatparya Vritti Commentary: In the earlier Gatha it was told that
the Jiva taking recourse to real naya becomes Samyak Drishti. But in this Gatha
it is told that not only real Nishchaya naya is meaningful to the Jivas
stationary in Nirvikalpa Samadhi; but Vyavahara nya is also meaningful for
preventing the Mithyatva, senses related
Kashaya bhava form corrupted dhyan in Savikalpa state sometimes to the jivas in the primary state devoid of
Nirvikalpa Samadhi similar to the benefit of lower purity gold in the absence
of availability of complete purity gold – Thus
it is informed. Shuddha naya is
Nishchaya naya. How is Shuddha naya? Where description of Shuddha naya is
there, there Shuddha order is there. Shuddha naya is worthy of knowledge,
should be experienced. By whom? Those desirous of viewing Shuddha atma.
Why is it
worthy of knowledge? Since like gold of purity of sixteen cycles, in the
period of the undifferentiated jewel
trio form Samadhi, the Shuddha naya is
meaningful. It is not meaningless. The Vyavahara is preached by Vyavahara
which describes differentiated vikalpa
form paryaya. That Vyavahara naya is meaningful like the benefit of lower
purity gold. For whom? Those people who are stationary in their Ashuddha bhava.
In other words from aspect of Asanyat Samyak Drishti or that of Shravak, having
Shubhopayoga having characteristics of Sarag Samyak Drishti Or from aspect of
Pramatta-Apramatta Sanyat, who are stationary in differentiated jewel trio form
shubhopayoga. Where are they stationary ? In those Jiva padartha- this is the Bhavartha.
-
In this way with narration of Nishchaya Vyavahara naya, with two gathas
the fifth stage is completed. In this way with fourteen gathas and five stages
the introduction is completed.
Now knowing
with Shuddha naya is Samyaktva , this is told by Sutrakar in Gatha-
Gatha 13: These nine Tattvas – Jiva, Ajiva, punya, pap, asrava,
samvar, nirjara, bandh and Moksha known by means of real naya are Samyaktva.
Commentary: These jivas etc. nine tattvas known with real naya are Samyak darshan
only ( this is the rule); since for practice of teertha (Vyavahara dharma) the
nine tattvas have been described by nonreal naya ( Vyavahara naya) whose
characteristics are jiva, ajiva, punya, pap, asrava, samvar, nirjara, bandh and
moksha – by attaining oneness with real naya within them, the experience of Atma established in
Shuddha naya form – whose characteristics is Atma Khyati, is attained. ( By
knowing nine tattvas with Shuddha naya the experience of Atma is attained, for
this reason this rule is described). There the corruptible and corrupter – both
are punya and both are pap, the doer of asrava and one eligible for asrava –
both are asrava, the one eligible for
samvar and doer of samvar- both are samvar, the one eligible for Nirjara and
the one doing Nirjara – both are
Nirjara, one eligible for bandh and the one causing bandh – both are bandh, one
eligible for Moksha and one doing Moksha – both are Moksha; since for one alone
the attainment of punya, pap, asrava, samvar, nirjara, bandh, moksha alone are
not possible. Both are jiva and ajiva ( out of the two one is jiva and other is
Ajiva).
If observed
from aspect of coarse view point then by experiencing the eternal bandh paryaya
of jiva-pudgala in one form, these nine tattvas are true, real and by
experiencing near the nature of one jiva Dravya alone, they are unreal, untrue
( They are not one with jiva nature). Hence in these nine tattvas with real
naya only jiva alone is
illuminated. In the same way if observed
with inner view point, then the gyayak bhava is jiva and the means for jiva
corruption is ajiva, and punya, pap, asrava, samvar, nirjara, bandh and moksha
are whose characteristics, such nine tattvas are only degeneration of jiva and punya, pap, asrava, samvar,
nirjara, bandh, and moksha are ajiva
means of degeneration. Thus these nine tattvas, leaving apart of nature of jiva
, self and others are whose cause,
experiencing in the form of single Dravya paryayas form they are real and experiencing near the nature of jiva
Dravya which is unchanged at all times,
they are unreal- untrue. Therefore in these tattvas with real naya only
jiva is illuminated. In this way illuminated in oneness form this is
experienced by means of Shuddha naya form. And the experience is Atma Khyati
( recognition of Atma) only. And the Atma Khyati is Samyak darshan only. In
this way this is flawless description, without hindrance.
Bhavartha: If
observed from aspect of Shuddha naya amongst these nine tattvas then only Jiva
is being revealed in Chaitanya-Chamatkar (miraculous) illumination form,
besides these the nine tattvas are not seen differently at all. So long as Jiva
does not have knowledge of Jiva tattva in this form, till then he is Vyavahara
Drishti, he believes in nine tattvas differently. From aspect of Bandh-paryaya
form Drishti of Jiva-pudgala these substances appear to be different; however
when from aspect of Shuddha naya the own forms of Jiva-Pudgala are seen
differently then these punya-pap etc.
seven tattvas are nothing. These occurred due to nimitta-naimittik bhava
and when the nimitta-naimittik bhava got eliminated then with Jiva-pudgala being different no other
substance can be established. The substance is Dravya and the own bhava of
Dravya remains with Dravya only and the nimitta-naimittik bhava remains absent
only. Therefore by knowing jiva with Shuddha naya only Samyak darshan can be attained. So long as nine substances are known
differently and Atma is not known with Shuddha naya, till then he is Paryaya Buddhi.
The same is
told in this kalash-
Shloka 8: In this way the Atma Jyoti hidden within these
nine tattvas is revealed by taking it out with Shuddha naya, just as singular
gold is drawn out hidden within the
mass of metals. Hence O Bhavya Jivas! Always observe it in singular form
different from other dravyas and the nimitta-naimittik bhavas produced with
them. This Jyoti at every step i.e. in each paryaya is illuminated in
Chaitanya-chamatkar form.
Bhavartha- This Atma was appearing in different forms in all states. It has been
shown to be Chaitanya Chamatkar form by means of Shuddha naya, hence experience
it always as singular form and do not follow ekant of paryaya buddhi- such is
preachment of Shri Gurus.
Commentary- Now, just as knowledge of one jiva
alone is told to be real amongst the nine tattvas, in the same way the
means of attainment of Atma illuminated in singular form which are Praman, Naya, Nikshep, these are also unreal from aspect of Nishchaya,
within them also this atma only is real ( since with divisions of gyeya and
words the Praman etc. have several forms). Out of them firstly Praman is two
types- Paroksh and Pratyaksh. The one which manifests by means of accessible (
like Indriyas/senses and mind etc.) and inaccessible (like illumination,
preachment etc.) other substances, that is Paroksh and the one which manifests
only by means of Atma only in definite form is Pratyaksh. ( Praman is Gyan and
it is of five types- Mati, Shruta, Awadhi, manah paryay and Keval. Out of
them Mati and Shruta Gyan are Paroksh,
Awadhi and Manah paryay are partial pratyaksh and Keval gyan is totally
pratyaksh. Hence these two types of Praman are there.) These two upon experiencing
the differences of Pramata ( the one
attaining knowledge), Praman (knowledge) and Prameya ( subject of knowledge), they are real and true and where all these differences
have become insignificant, experiencing near the nature of such one jiva, these are unreal, untrue.
Naya are of
two types- Dravyarthika and
Paryayarthika. There in the Dravya-Paryaya form substance, the one which
provides experience of Dravya primarily is Dravyarthika naya and the one
which provides experience of paryaya
primarily is Paryayarthika naya. These two nayas upon experiencing the
divisions of Dravya and paryaya, they are real, true but upon experiencing the nature(Chaitanya alone) of Shuddha
substance form Jiva unembraced with both Dravya and paryaya, they are unreal,
untrue.
There are
four divisions of Nikshep- naam ( name), sthapana( installation), Dravya and
bhava. Even without presence of a guna(quality) within the substance calling
the substance with the name of that quality ( for Vyavahara) is Naam Nikshep.
‘This is that thing’ - in this way
another substance is told as representative of other substance ( in the form of
idol), such is Sthapana Nikshep. Describing the thing by means of its past or
future paryaya in the present is Dravya Nikshep. Describing the
thing by means of its present paryaya in present is Bhava Nikshep. These four
Nikshep upon experiencing by means of own different characteristics, they are
real, true while upon experiencing the
jiva nature having one Chaitanya characteristics devoid of other
characteristics , all these four are unreal, untrue. In this way amongst the
Praman-Naya-Nikshep only jiva is illuminated in real form.
Bhavartha- The details of subject of Praman-Naya-Nikshep should be known from the
granths dealing with that subject. With them the Dravya-paryaya form substance gets
established. In the Sadhak state these are real anyway since they are specifics
of Gyan only. Without them if it is attempted to establish the substance by any
other means then it becomes
erroneous. There are three ways for
elimination of Vyavahara – in the first stage by knowing the real substance by
means of Praman etc., to establish the Gyan-Shraddhan; upon establishment of
Gyan-Shraddhan there is no need for Praman etc for Shraddhan. But in the second
stage with recourse to Praman etc. specific gyan is attained and YathaKhyat
Charitra of the form of complete absence of raga-dwesha-moha karma gets
revealed, by which Keval Gyan is
attained. Upon attainment of Keval
Gyan there is no need for recourse to
Praman etc. Subsequently third stage is Siddha state , there also there is no
recourse. In this way in Siddha state
there is absence of Praman-Naya-Nikshep.
This is
elaborated with the kalash form Shloka-
Shloka 9: Acharya
experiencing the Shuddha naya ignoring all these differentiations, says that after
experiencing the subject of Shuddha naya - the Chaitanya chamatkar form mass of
illumination form Atma, the mass of nayas does not fructify, Praman gets
subdued and where the group of Niksheps vanish, we do not know. What more can
we say? Duality itself is not seen.
Bhavartha: Ignoring
the differentiations it is told that leave apart the subject of Praman, naya
etc. , with Shuddha experience no duality is perceived, singular Chaitanya
alone is seen.
Here Vigyan
Adwaitvadi and vedanti say that lastly the Adwait only was experienced in real form- the same is our view, what did you
tell differently? Its reply- In your faith the adwait is believed to be
absolute. If absolute adwait is accepted then the external things get
eliminated and such absence is contradictory directly. In out faith the
external things are not eliminated. When the vikalpa is eliminated by Shuddha
experience then Atma attains supreme bliss. Hence for experiencing it is told
that “In shuddha experience the dwait does not get perceived.” If external
things are eliminated then atma also gets
eliminated and the context of Shunyavad would prevail. Hence the nature
of things does not get established from the way you tell and without true
shraddha of nature of things, the Shuddha experience is also Mithya form; with
context of shunya your experience is also like experience of flower in the sky.
Now fruition
of Shuddha naya occurs, this is informed in following Shloka:
Shloka 10: Shuddha
naya gets fructified revealing the Atma nature. The nature of Atma is revealed
to be different from other Dravya,
bhavas of other Dravya and own vibhava occurring with the nimitta of other
Dravya – all such other bhavas. And that nature of Atma is complete in every
possible way – knower of all the Lokalok- this is revealed; ( Since divisions
of gyan are due to conjunction of karmas and in Shuddha naya the karmas are
ignored.) And it reveals the nature of Atma to be without beginning or end. (
i.e. it is not produced in the beginning by anyone and it does not get
destroyed by anyone, such Paarinamik bhava is revealed.) And it reveals the
nature of Atma to be singular form free of all differentiating bhavas and where
all mass of sankalpa and vikalpa have vanished, it reveals thus. ( imagining
self within Dravya karma, bhava karma and no karmas etc. pudgala dravyas is
Sankalpa and with differentiations of gyeyas the knowledge of divisions of gyan is vikalpa) Such Shuddha
naya gets illuminated.
Tatparya Vritti Commentary: Some Nikat Bhavya ( shortly to attain Moksha) jiva from the
narration of introduction itself knowing the despicable and venerable tattva
engages in the bhavana of pure gyan-darshan natured own form; but the disciple
interested in detail knowing the Samaysar by means of nine Adhikar engages in
bhavana later. It is as follows- For explaining the disciple interested in
detail the narration of Samaysar by means of Jiva etc. nine Padarth adhikars is
carried out. There firstly by the Gatha of adhikar of Nine padarth the darshan
of Shuddha Atma form, experience of Shuddha atma, observation of Shuddha atma,
attainment of Shuddha atma, feeling, realisation, khyati (fame) and
understanding of those existent within Nirvikalpa Samayik having
characteristics of the complete
renunciation of Arta-Roudra dhyan, is described. The same
is called from aspect of Nishchaya naya, Nishchaya Samyaktva form Veetrag Samyaktva which is having invariable
concomitance with Nishchaya Charitra and the same (samyaktva) from aspect of
Nishchaya naya of the form of non differentiation of guna-guni is of the form
of Shuddhatma, this is first part. Or, by knowing nine padarth in reality
which is subject of samyaktva in
undivided Upachar sense, they are nimitta
of Vyavahara Samyaktva; but from aspect of Nishchaya naya the Shuddha
manifestation of own Atma alone is Samyaktva, this is second part. With these two parts in mind this Gatha sutra
is stated-
In
reality , from aspects of Nishchaya naya, Shuddha naya they are expressed, decided, confirmed, known.
Who? The nine padarthas form jiva,
ajiva, punya, pap, asrava, samvar, nirjara, bandh, moksha. These nine padartha
alone are Samyaktva being subject of samyaktva in undifferentiated upachar. From aspect of
Nishchaya the own manifestation is Samyaktva.
Nine padartha are samyaktva as known from aspect of reality – this you
told, what is the nature of the knowledge of that reality? Upon asking this he
answers. Although from aspect of beginner disciple for activity of Teertha the
nine padartha are called as real, even then during the period of nirvikalpa
samadhi having characteristics of undifferentiated jewel trio, these nine padartha
are unreal, untrue, not Shuddha form. In that Param Samadhi period amongst the
nine padartha only one shuddhatma gets illuminated by means of Shuddha
nishchaya naya, realised and experienced .
That experience, realisation or Shuddha atma attainment only is
Nishchaya Samyaktva. That experience from aspect of Nishchaya naya having
undifferentiated consideration of Guna-Guni is of the form of shuddhatma, such
is the implication. And the Praman-Naya-Nikshep are assisting cause form during
period of Paramatma Tattva contemplation. Only in Savikalpa state they are real
and in period of Param Samadhi they are unreal. In nine padartha in reality
only one Shuddha jiva only is experienced.
This concludes the gatha of nine padartha adhikar.
That Shuddha
naya is described by Gatha Sutra-
Gatha 14: The naya which observes the Atma as free of bandh, devoid
of contact with other Dravya, devoid of
differentness, devoid of indefiniteness, free of specificness, devoid of
conjunction with others- such five bhava
forms, O Disciple ! Know that as Shuddha naya.
Commentary: From aspect of Nishchaya the non bonded- non contacted, unique, definite,
non different, and devoid of conjunction – the experience of such Atma is
Shuddha naya and that experience is Atma only. In this way one Atma only is
illuminated. ( Shuddha naya, experience of Atma and Atma – all are one only,
not separate). Here disciple enquires that how does one get experience of Atma
from the above description? Its answer
is as follows- Bonded-contacted etc. bhavas are unreal hence this experience
can be attained. This is elaborated by means of allegory – Just as if lotus
leaf is sunk in water then upon experiencing
its state of touching water, the contact with water is real-true, even
then upon experiencing from aspect of lotus leaf nature of not touching water
at all, the contact with water is unreal- untrue. In the same way experiencing
from aspect of eternally bonded Atma with pudgala karmas, the
bonding-contacting state is real- true, even
then upon experiencing near the
nature of Atma of absolutely not
touching pudgala, the bonding-contacting
is unreal- untrue. Just as upon experiencing from the aspect of paryayas of mud,
the bowl, pot, cup etc. the
differentness is real – true; even then by going near the nature of mud ( which
does not have any differentness in all paryayas) and experiencing the differentness is unreal
– untrue. In the same way upon experiencing the Atma in Narak etc. paryaya
forms the differentness is real -true, however upon experiencing near the
nature of Chaitanya shaped Atma (which does not have any differentness in all
paryayas), the differentness is unreal- untrue.
Just as upon
experiencing the low-high form states of ocean the indefiniteness is real
-true, even then upon experiencing the nature of ocean (by going near it which
is always steady) the indefiniteness is unreal -untrue. In the same way upon
experiencing the different high-low paryayas of Atma the indefiniteness is real-true , even then
by going near the permanent stationary
Atma nature and experiencing, then indefiniteness is unreal -untrue.
Just as upon
experiencing the smoothness, yellowness, weight etc. different gunas of gold,
the uniqueness is real – true; however where all specifics have vanished , in
going near such gold nature and
experiencing, the uniqueness is unreal-untrue. In the same way upon
experiencing the different gunas of gyan-darshan etc. of Atma, the uniqueness
is real-true, even then where all
specifics have vanished, by going near the nature of Atma and experiencing ,
the uniqueness is unreal-untrue.
Just as upon
experiencing the hot state of water due
to conjoining with heat with the nimitta of fire, the conjoined heated form is
real-true, even then by experiencing near the ekant cold nature of water the
conjoining ( with heat) is unreal- untrue. In the same way by experiencing the
Atma in conjoined state with Moha with the nimitta of karma, the conjoining is
real- true, even then upon experiencing near the jiva nature which is ekant gyan form alone, the conjoining is
unreal- untrue.
Bhavartha – Atma
appears in different forms in five ways-
(1) It
appears to be in touch with karma pudgala being bonded with karma pudgala since
eternal times.
(2) It
appears in different forms due to different paryayas of Nar-Narak form produced
with the nimitta of karma.
(3) The
Avibhag Praticcheda (fractions) of shakti reduces and increases - this is nature of substance, hence it does
not appear in permanently fixed same form.
(4) It
appears in specific forms by means of several darshan-gyan gunas.
(5) Having
manifestations of Moha, raga, dwesha with the nimitta of karmas, it appears to
be in sukh-dukh form.
All these
are subjects of ashuddha dravyarthika
form Vyavahara naya. If observed
from aspect of this Drishti then all these are true. But one nature of Atma is
not realised by means of this naya and without knowing one nature how can real Atma be known? Hence the second naya-
its opponent Shuddha Dravyarthika naya – should be realised and taking one
uncommon gyayak alone form bhava of Atma, it is observed from aspect of Shuddha
naya as different from all other drravyas, one with all paryayas, without
high-low, devoid of specifics, and free of naimittika bhavas; then in all five
bhavas the differentness is unreal -untrue.
Here it
should be understood that the nature of thing is infinite dharma form, that is
established with Syadvad as real. Atma also has infinite dharmas. Some of the
dharmas of it are natural and some are produced in conjunction with pudgala.
The ones which occur in conjunction with karma, with them the Atma manifests in
worldly forms and the sukh-dukh produced due to them are enjoyed by him. This
is paryaya buddhi of Atma due to eternal
agyan; he does not have knowledge of
beginningless-endless one Atma. This is told by Agam of omniscient. In
that with Shuddha Dravyarthika naya it is told that Atma has one extraordinary
Chaitanya bhava which is indivisible, permanent and indestructible. By knowing
it, the partiality of paryaya buddhi gets eliminated. When jiva experiences own
Atma as differently from other dravyas, their bhavas and vibhava produced with
their nimitta then he does not manifest
in other dravya’s bhava form; hence karma bandh does not occur and salvation
from world is attained. Therefore ignoring paryayarthika form Vyavahara naya,
it is called as unreal untrue and Shuddha Nishchaya naya is called as true and
taken recourse to. After attainment of
nature of thing , even that recourse is
not required.
From this
statement it should not be misunderstood that since Shuddha naya is called as
true then Ashuddha naya is absolutely untrue only. With such belief, the
absolute ekant stand of the Vedant faith followers would be accepted who
believe the world to be absolute non-thing, and it would result in Mithyatva. In this way the recourse to Shuddha
naya also would result in Mithyatva like
that of Vedant followers. Therefore by
carrying out true shraddhan of all nayas in certain aspect only, would lead to
being Samyak Drishti. Therefore by understanding Syadvad, the Jina faith should
be practiced. By listening to primary-secondary statements, absolute ekant side
should not be accepted. Describing this gatha sutra the commentator Acharya has
also told that Atma appears from aspect of Vyavahara naya as bonded-contacted
etc. forms, that is true from aspect of that Drishti. But from aspect of
Shuddha naya the bonded-contacted forms are untrue . With this statement the
commentator has told Syadvad, know thus.
Here it
should be understood that naya is part of shurta gyan-praman; the shruta gyan
reveals the thing in Paroksh form; hence this naya also tells in Paroksh form.
The subject of Shuddha Dravyarthika naya, Atma is Chaitanya Shakti alone devoid
of bonded-touched etc. five bhavas. That shakti is there Paroksh form in Atma, and its revelation is Mati-Shruta etc.
gyan form with karma conjunction, that
being experienced in certain aspect is called as Pratyaksh form also. The
complete gyan -Keval Gyan although is not Pratyaksh to Chhadmastha, even then
this Shuddha naya tells the Keval Gyan form of Atma as Paroksh. So long as Jiva
does not know this naya till then the gyan-shraddhan of complete form of Atma
is not attained. Therefore shri Guru has revealed this Shuddha naya and
preached that complete gyan ghan swabhava Atma should be known and believed devoid of
bonded-contacted etc. five bhavas and one should not remain Paryaya Buddhi.
Here if
someone enquires that such Atma is not seen Pratyaksh and without seeing having Shraddha is untrue shraddhan. Its
answer is this- Having shraddhan of only visible is Nastik faith. In Jain faith
Pratyaksh and Paroksh both are accepted as Praman. Out of them Agam Praman is Paroksh; its division is
Shuddha naya. With Drishti of this Shuddha naya the shraddhan of
Shuddha atma should be carried out, only ekant of Vyavahara-Pratyaksh should
not be followed.
Here Kalash
form verse is told with primacy of Shuddha naya-
Shloka 11- People
of the world! Experience this Samyak nature where the bonded-contacted etc.
bhava clearly float above the swabhava, even then they do not find entry in it;
since Dravya swabhava is nitya and one form while these bhavas are Anitya and
several form; Paryayas do not enter into Dravya swabhava, they remain above
only. This Shuddha swabhava is illuminated in all states. Such Shuddha swabhava
should be experienced by the world being free of Moha; since with fruition of
Moha karma so long as the produced Mithyatva form agyan remains, till then the
experience is not real.
Bhavartha- Here
the preachment is that the subject form Atma of Shuddha naya should be
experienced.
Now the same
meaning is expressed with Kalash form verse again, where it is told that with such experience the Atma deva is
explicitly perceived.
Shloka 12: If
some Subuddhi ( Samyak Drishti) Jiva separating immediately bandh of karmas of
all three kaals -past, present, future from own Atma and preventing or
destroying with own purushartha the
Mithyatva (agyan) generated with the nimitta of that fruition of karma,
thus practice internally – and
observe then that Atma is having
explicit magnificence experienceable by
self , immobile, permanent, free of karma impurities, venerable deva form.
Bhavartha- From
aspect of Shuddha naya the Chaitanya Deva indestructible Atma free of all
karmas is present internally within himself. This prani -paryaya budhhi Bahiratma
searches it outside, it is great agyan.
Now ‘the
experience of Atma subject of Shuddha naya only is experience of Gyan’- such
next Gatha is informed by the following kalash-
Shloka 13: In
this way the earlier described Shuddha
naya form experience of Atma which is there, that only is real experience of
Gyan. Knowing this and establishing Atma within Atma in stationary form,
‘always from all sides one gyan ghan form Atma is there’ thus it should be
viewed.
Bhavartha : Earlier description was made with
Samyak darshan as primary, now gyan is made primary and told that the subject
of Shuddha naya form experience of Atma
only is Samyak Gyan.
Collective Introduction ( Tatparya Vritti)- Here in nine Adhikars till 28th
Gatha firstly Jiva Adhikar is described. There from aspect of primacy of simple
blissful singular natured Shuddha Atma Bhavana there are three gathas in first
stage. Later by illustration and
Siddhant with Bhavana of bheda-abheda jewel trio there are three gathas in
second stage. Next there is one gatha describing the ignorant nature of Jiva
and the second gatha describes the manifestations causing bandh-moksha.
From aspect of ashuddha Nishchaya naya
the Jivva is karta of Raga etc. form manifestations – such is third gatha. In
this way in third stage there are three gathas
which are mutually independent. Subsequently in the fourth stage there are
three gathas narrating the characteristics of ignorant with example of fire and
fuel. Next there are three gathas in fifth stage for explaining the agyani the
bhavana of undifferentiated jewel trio with the characteristics of Samyak
shraddhan-gyan- anubhuti of shuddhatma tattva.
Next
without knowing the shuddhatma tattva having characteristics of Nishchaya jewel
trio , the first side of argument is
that body is Atma , its form is
narrated by one gatha. Then there is prayer of body in Vyavahara form and then
prayer of shuddhatma in Nishchaya form- in this way with primacy of description
of differentiation of two nayas , there are four gathas. Then there are three
gathas from primacy of Nishchaya Prayer of Shuddhatma Anubhuti with
characteristics of Supreme detachment. In this way the sixth stage incorporates
eight gathas. Subsequently the Nirvikar gyan of own experience only is
renunciation of sensory subjects, Kashaya etc. other dravyas- this is stated in
four gathas in seventh stage. Next in conclusion form there is one gatha
describing the form of Atma which is
subject of bhavana of undifferentiated jewel trio form own experience having
characteristics of infinite gyan etc. with Samyak shraddhan- gyan and acharan.
In this way with 28 gathas and seven stages the collective introduction of Jiva
Adhikar is carried out.
Tatparya Vritti Commentary: Now in the first Gatha even in worldly state from aspect
of Shuddha naya, the Atma is unbonded-untouched, non-different, definite, non
specific and non conjoined – characterised by these five adjectives; just as
lotus leaf, mud, ocean, gold and unheated water are there. Such Shuddhatma is
described- The one who sees and knows. Whom? Shuddhatma. How? Non
bonded-untouched, like lotus leaf in water untouched with Dravya karma-no
karma; non-different like mud Dravya in sthas-kosh-kushool-pot etc. paryayas - in the same way in Nar-Narak etc. paryayas of Atma non
different(same to same) in Dravya form;
definite stationary like ocean even in high
or low waves states; non specific like gold having dharmas of
weight-yellowness-smoothness etc. without having specifics of gyan-darshan
etc.; non conjoined like water without heat from aspect of Nishchaya naya atma
is non conjoined with ragas etc. vikalpa form Bhava karma. That Atma from
aspect of undifferentiated naya, being
subject of Shuddha naya, with Sadhak-ness of Shuddhatma, manifesting
in Shuddha intent form it should be
known as Shuddha- such is Bhavartha.
This meaning
is expressed in next gatha-
Continued….