Gatha 38: The consciousness is of three kinds. One lot of Jiva experiences only the
fruition of karmas, another lot of Jivas experiences the pangs of activity and
the third lot of Jivas experience only the knowledge.
This is
elaboration of consciousness quality of
Jiva which manifests in three forms.
Some conscious souls who are deluded with very
strong Moha due to which their knowledge
is obscured with very strong Gyanavarana, experience with their consciousness
only the fruition of karmas, since their capability of doing something has been
destroyed with very strong Veeryantaraya karma. Hence they are said to have only Karma Phal Chetana.
The second
kind of souls have delusion due to strong Moha and have some knowledge due to
not so strong Gyanavarana karma , therefore they have some capability to do
something due to Kshayopasham (subsidence cum destruction) of Veeryantaraya
karma. Therefore in their consciousness, they have capability to experience
Karma Phal Chetana in the form of happiness-unhappiness. In addition they also have Karma
Chetana of the sense of doing things
The third
kind are souls who have destroyed Moha completely and with the destruction of
Gyanavarana their capability has been fully realised, who have immense
capability due to destruction of Veeryantaraya karma, such conscious souls
experience blissful knowledge. They do not experience karma Chetana and Karma
phal chatena since nothing more need to be done. They experience Gyan Chetana alone.
Gatha 39: All Sthavar Jivas experience only the karma phal, the Trasa jivas
experience the karma phal along with karma Chetana and those who have traversed
beyond Pranas , they experience Gyan only.
Here it has
been told that which Jiva has which type of consciousness.
The
consciousness means the same as experiencing. The Sthavar Jivas experience the
Karma phal, the Trasa jivas experience karma phal along with desire to do
something in the form of Karma Chetana. The Keval Gyani Bhagwan has none of
these two and he experiences only blissful Gyan Chetana.
It may be noted here that the partial Gyan Chetana
along with karma Chetana and karma phal Chetana has not been described which
would be the state of Samyak Drishti jiva who would experience all three kinds
of Chetana at lower level of spiritual development.
Gatha 40: The Upayoga is of two kinds for the Jiva. One is Gyan and other is
darshan with which the Jiva is always equipped in integral manner.
Here the
Upayoga quality of Jiva is described.
The
manifestation in accordance with consciousness of the soul is called Upayoga.
This is of two kinds- Gyanopayoga and Darshanopayoga. Here, the one which pays
attention to detail(specific) is Gyan
while one which pays attention in general is Darshan. Upayoga is non-different
from the jiva since they have common existence.
Gatha 41: Gyan has five divisions- Abhinibodhik (Mati), Shruta, Avadhi, Manah
Paryay and Keval Gyan. There are three
Agyans (ignorance) namely KuMati, KuShruta and Vibhang Gyan. This way there are
eight divisions of Gyanaopayoga.
Here the
types of Gyanopayoga and their nature are described.
In reality soul is pure knowledge in general form
in all its soul Pradesh.
However due to obscuration by eternal Gyanavarana karma, it manifests in
following forms:
(1) With the kshayopasham of
Matigyanavarana karma, it knows the corporeal and non corporeal dravyas in
incomplete specific manner with assistance of senses and mind. This is
Abhinibodhik Gyan.
(2) With Kshayopasham of ShrutaGyanavarna
karma, and assistance of mind, it knows the corporeal and non corporeal dravyas
in incomplete specific manner. This is Shruta Gyan
(3) With kshayopasham of
AvadhiGyanavarana karma, it knows the corporeal dravya in incomplete specific
manner directly . This is Avadhi Gyan.
(4) With Kshayopasham of Manah Paryay
Gyanavarana karma, it knows the corporeal dravya corresponding to other jivas
mind in incomplete specific manner
directly. This is manah parayay gyan.
(5) With total destruction of
obscuration, the soul knows all the corporeal and non corporeal dravyas
completely and specifically. That is natural Keval Gyan.
(6) The Abhinibodhik gyan along with
Mithya darshan is KuMatiGyan
(7) The SrutaGyan along with Mithya
darshan is KuShrutaGyan.
(8) The Avadhi Gyan along with Mithya
Darshan is Vibhang Gyan.
Gatha 42: Darshan also is said to be have four divisions namely Chakshu Darshan,
Achakshu Darshan, Avadhi Darshan and Keval Darshan which has infinite subjects
and is indestructible.
Here
Darshanopayoga is described along with its divisions and natures.
In reality soul is pure Darshan in general form in
all its Soul Pradesh.
However due to obscuration by eternal Darshanavarana karma, it manifests in
following forms:
1. With the Kshayopasham of Chakshu
Darshanavarana karmas and with the means of Chakshu senses (eyes) its observes
the corporeal substances in incomplete general manner. This is Chakshu Darshan.
2. With the Kshayopasham of Achakshu
Darshanavarana karmas and with the means of all remaining four senses and mind,
it senses the corporeal-non corporeal substances in incomplete general manner.
This is Achakshu Darshan.
3. With the kshayopasham of Avadhi Darshanavarana
karmas it senses the corporeal substances in incomplete general manner directly
. It is Avadhi darshan.
4. With total destruction of obscuration, soul
alone observes the corporeal-non corporeal substances completely in general
manner, that is natural Keval darshan.
Gatha 43: The Gyani (soul) cannot be differentiated by means of Knowledge; however
knowledge is of different kinds that’s why Gyani people have called the dravya
to have several forms.
This is declaration of one soul having several
knowledge forms.
Firstly the
Gyani (soul) is not different from knowledge; since both have the same
existence and both belong to same dravya. Both have same Pradesh therefore they
occupy same space, both belong to same kaal, both have the same nature. However
in spite of saying so, the existence of Matigyan etc. different knowledges in
soul do not cause contradiction since dravya is of the form of world (having
several forms). In reality dravya supports infinite co-existent qualities and
sequential infinite paryayas hence it is having infinite forms also even though
it is one only. Therefore there is no contradiction in one soul having several
knowledges.
Gatha 44: If dravya be different from qualities and qualities be different from
dravya then there would be infinite dravyas or dravya itself would not exist.
Dravya cannot be separate from qualities,
otherwise it leads to anomaly.
The
qualities are always supported by something and that support is Dravya. If that
dravya be different from qualities then who would support the qualities ? If
dravya be different from qualities then it would require infinite dravyas to
support the qualities. If qualities are considered to be different from their
group then dravya itself would not exist.
Gatha 45: Dravya and qualities are indivisibly same. Those who are knowledgeable
about reality, they do not believe them to be divisible-different or
divisible-same.
Here the oneness of dravya and qualities has been
described.
Dravya and
qualities are accepted to be having indivisible Pradesh form sameness. They are not accepted to be having
different Pradesh form differentness or oneness. Just as a single Paramanu has
oneness with its Pradesh being indivisible, in the same way the touch-taste-smell-colour
qualities of that Paramanu are non-different from that Pradesh and are one with
it. Just as quite separated Vindhya and Sahya mountains have different Pradesh
and hence are different, or quite close such mixed milk and water have different
Pradesh form oneness but the
dravya and qualities are not separable in Pradesh hence they do not have
differentness.
Gatha 46: Statement, Sansthan(shape), Numbers and subjects are several but those
can be made in oneness of dravya-qualities or differentness also.
Here it is negated that by statement etc. dravya-qualities would be different. (They can be made in both cases).
Just as “cow
of Devadatta” informs differentness of Devadatta from cow , in the same way “
branch of tree” states the oneness of tree from branch like “qualities of
dravya”. Just as “Devadatta plucks the fruit for Dhanadatta by means of sickle
from the tree in the garden” describes different predicates showing
differentness, in the same way “ mud manifests by itself in the pot form within
itself, for itself” or “ soul knows soul by the soul, for the soul, within the
soul “ – in this manner different predicates are stated in sameness also. Just
as “ tall Devadatta has tall cow” shows different Sansthan(shape), in the same
way “ Large tree has large branches”or “ corporeal dravya has corporeal
qualities”, sameness is described in Sansthan also. Just as “Devadatta has ten
cows” states the differentness in numbers, in the same way “one tree with ten
branches” or “one dravya has infinite qualities” states sameness with numbers.
Just as “ cows in shed” describes the differentness with subject , in the same
way “tree with branches” or “dravya with qualities” describe the oneness with
subject. Hence it should be accepted that the statements etc. do not establish
the dravya and qualities to be different
Gatha 47: Just as wealth and knowledge cause a person to be called ‘wealthy’ and
‘knowledgeable’ – in these two ways , in the same way the differentness and
oneness are described by wise ones.
This example describes the oneness and
differentness in the substance.
Just as
wealth having (1) different existence (2) different Sansthan (3) different
numbers (4) different subjects, causes a
person to be wealthy who is (1)having different existence (2) different
sansthan (3) different numbers (4) different subject and just as knowledge
having (1) same existence (2) same
sansthan (3) same numbers (4) same subjects cause a person to be called as
Knowledgeable who is having (1) same
existence (2) same sansthan (3) same numbers (4) same subjects; it shows that where the
statements are made with respect to differences of dravyas there is
differentness but where the statements are made with respect to sameness of
dravya there is oneness.
Gatha 48: If Gyani (soul) and the gyan are always different substances then both
would be insentient – this is not acceptable to Jinas.
If Gyani
(soul) is different from gyan then just as Devadatta without axe cannot perform
the work , in the same way the soul would be incapable of performing the work
without knowledge hence soul would become
insentient. If Gyan is different from Gyani (soul) then just as axe
cannot perform the work without
Devadatta, in the same way the knowledge cannot perform the work of ‘doer’
Gyani and therefore would remain non-conscious only.
Further it
is not like man with axe is called Axe-man that soul and knowledge were
different and together they became Gyani. The soul and knowledge were never
separate like man and the axe. Dravya cannot be without its specific (quality)
hence soul cannot be without gyan. Similarly quality cannot be without
supporting dravya hence knowledge cannot be without soul. Therefore soul and knowledge are
not different.
Gatha 49: By means of ‘samvaya ‘ (attachment) of Gyan, the soul becomes ’Gyani’ – such belief is
incorrect. The term ‘Agyani’ establishes the oneness of quality and dravya.
Here the
relationship of Gyan and Gyani is due to ‘Samvaya’ (attachment) of knowledge to
Gyani – this is refuted.
If it is so
then question arises that before attachment of Gyan with soul, whether the soul
was Gyani or Agyani? If it is said that Soul was gyani then there is no purpose
served by the attachment of gyan. If it is said that soul was Agyani, then the
question is asked that whether he was Agyani due to attachment of Agyan
(ignorance) or due to oneness with Agyan? Since there is no purpose of having attachment of Agyan
to Agyani, that option is ruled out. Nor can he be Gyani in absence of Agyan.
If it establishes that he was Agyani due to oneness with Agyan, then it
automatically establishes that one can have oneness with gyan also.
Question: In
Chhadmastha ( 4th-12th Gunasthana jiva) state the jiva has
limited knowledge but in Kevali state he is Omniscient with complete knowledge.
There the Bhagwan had Samvaya of keval gyan?
Answer: No,
it is not so. Jiva and knowledge quality are always together, being
indifferent. Even in Chhadmastha state, in the knowledge quality, the keval
gyan is present in terms of capability. In Kevali state, that quality is realised and explicitly
present. The knowledge is not received from somewhere else and attached to
soul. The difference of states is seen due to capability and its
explicit manifestation.
Gatha 50: Samvaya is nothing but co-existence. Same is indifferent-ness and same is
AyutSiddha-ness. Therefore the Dravya and qualities are AyutSiddha, as told by
Jinas:
Here it is
refuted that Samvaya relationship applies to different substances.
The dravya
and its qualities have the same existence eternally and that coexistence only
is ‘samvaya’ as per Jain philosophy. Although between dravya and qualities
there is difference of name, numbers etc., in the context of substance they are
non-different. Since they do not exist separately hence they are AyutSiddha (
same existence).
Continued…..