Pandit Todarmalji wrote commentary on Gommatsar shastra in
18th Century. Gommatsar was written by Acharya Nemichandra in 9th
Century which itself was a condensed version of Dhavala shastra written in 8th
Century by Acharya Virasen. Dhavala granths were commentary on Shatkhandagam
granth written in 1st Century by Acharya Bhutabali and Pushpadant.
Over this period of time people had forgotten to read these scriptures and were
objects of worship only. Pandit Todarmalji revived understanding of these by
writing simple commentary Samyak Gyan Chandrika on Gommatsar. He never got an
opportunity to see the Dhavala scriptures since they were stored in South.
Still his commentary only has assisted people to understand Dhavla and
Shatkhandagam. His contribution for bringing the Jain scriptures to masses is phenomenal.
He has explained the reason for writing Samyak Gyan Chandrika in the prologue
which is very illuminating. I have tried to provide a summary of that in the
following article for the benefit of those who cannot follow Hindi script.
Those who can read Hindi are advised to read the original.
Pandit Todarmalji begins by informing his intention of
writing commentary on Gommatsar in country language ( Dhundhari) for the
benefit of those who cannot follow the
original although he is not an expert. His style of writing is in the form of
Q&A as follows:
Q : If
you don’t know then why do you want to write?
A: Just as we cannot describe qualities of
Jinendra Bhagwan , but still out of respect we attempt to do so, in the same
way I attempt to highlight the meaning of this scripture.
Q: If you have attachment then spend time in
learning, but non experts have no right to write commentary.
A: Just as in a school some students are
bright and they assist the weaker ones to learn, in the same way without having
extra knowledge I am trying to help those who are weaker than me.
Q : You have attempted to do Herculean task in
which the mistakes are cause for ridicule by
others. In the same way , being
non expert , attempting such work, mistakes would be cause of laughter for others.
A: It is true that I will make mistakes but
experts would not laugh at me and they will think that I am a child only hence
he is entitled to make mistakes but still better than others who are still
weaker than myself.
Q: Ok experts would not make fun of you but
detractors would make fun?
A : Rogues are such only who dislike others’
innocence and good qualities. But out of fear of them why harm our own benefit?
Q: Scriptures were already there which you
could have taught or practiced, but why are you attempting to demonstrate your
greatness by writing this commentary?
A :
Writing commentary is more absorbing than practicing scripture and in
the process the learning is better. Getting opportunity to teach others is very
rare and very few are benefited whereas
commentary is beneficial to several people who get to know the meaning of
scriptures. Therefore I am writing for my own benefit as well as others. There
is no objective of demonstrating greatness.
Q: It might be beneficial but because of
committing mistakes you accrue pap
(demerits) karma ?
A: The total
knowledge of all meanings is only to Kevali Bhagwan and others have knowledge
in accordance with the subsidence /destruction of their knowledge obscuring
karmas , who may understand the meaning differently. The Bhagwan has preached that by paying obeisance to false
deity, false guru and false scriptures or due to anger, pride, deceit, greed,
fear etc. if one wrongly believes or
teaches then he is a great sinner. However without having benefit of
knowledgeable Guru , or without having much expertise, if an intricate meaning is
misunderstood and accordingly preached then it is not a great sin as it is
written in this book only(gatha 27)-
Those who without having
specific knowledge and due to ignorance
of Guru misunderstand the form of omniscient etc. ; in this manner accept it as the preaching
of Arihant although it is false; even then they are right believer since they accepted it out of
obedience of the Arihant.
Q: why did you not
learn from the knowledgeable guru before attempting to write commentary on this
scripture?
A: In these times
there are no Kevali or shrutakevali. Even the knowledgeable gurus are rare.
Those who are there are far and inaccessible. Further the age, health, strength
is limited hence whatever is possible has been attempted.
Q: But if you make a
mistake, how to rectify the same?
A: I request the
knowledgeable people indirectly here that I am ignorant without knowledge of
grammar, maths, logic of religious text hence I am weak, but still have
attempted to write commentary out of devotion to religion, hence wherever I
make mistake they are requested to kindly forgive me and correct me.
Q: Still the
commentary should have been in Sanskrit for such a great scripture. In country
language its magnificence is not felt.
A: Sanskrit
commentary is already available but many people are ignorant of Sanskrit,
grammar etc. hence are not able to enter the subject. Therefore for their
benefit I am writing in country language. Those who know Sanskrit can read the
original scripture in Sanskrit.
Now Pandit Todarmalji addresses
the readers. O Bhavya Jivas ! For your
own good, whichever way possible you should practice this scripture. Because
the good of the soul is in Moksha only. Rest is dependent on others,
destructible and painful. Only Moksha is own nature , indestructible and
infinitely enjoyable. Hence all efforts should be for achieving Moksha. Moksha
can be achieved through right belief, right knowledge and right conduct. These
can be achieved only through knowing nature of Jiva etc.
Right belief is knowing the nature
of Jiva etc. without which the belief is like flower in the sky. First know
them and experience them by which one
realizes the nature of soul. Thus
knowledge is cause of right belief and then only it is called right knowledge.
Further he detaches himself from unwanted and accepts the beneficial , then it
is called right conduct. Following rituals out of ignorance is not right
conduct. In this manner knowing Jivas etc. only is cause of Moksha . By
learning this scripture the knowledge of Jiva etc. is real because this world
is a relationship between Jivas and karmas. By knowing that relationship one
can destroy it which alone is Moksha. In this scripture there is specific
description of Jivas , 6 dravyas, 7
tatvas etc. Hence do practice this scripture.
Now several people have preference
for specific type of scriptures and they put forth their arguments in support
of their preferences. The Jain scriptures can be divided into four categories
namely 1) Prathamanuyoga 2)
Charananuyoga 3) Dravyanuyoga and 4)Karananuyoga which specialize in specific aspects of
religion. First deals with Mythological stories, second with conduct, third
with philosophy and fourth with mathematics and siddhanta respectively.
1. Supporter
of Prathamanuyoga says : In
these inferior times the people have limited knowledge and they cannot follow
such intricate scriptures hence they should only read stories of Tirthankaras
etc so that they fear of doing sins and be religious.
Reply:
Even now all people are not alike and they have different understanding. Hence
depending upon the capability of the person he should be preached. Even
ignorant can become knowledgeable with practice. Further they can also practice
learning of general and specific Gunasthana etc with assistance of more
knowledgeable people.
Q :
we believe that Gommatsar has difficult mathematics in it hence how can we
enter this subject?
A:
Don’t fear. In this commentary maths has been simplified hence not difficult. Some
places it is easy and some places difficult. If all can be attempted then it is
good otherwise whatever is feasible should be learnt. Do not be lazy in making
effort.
Q :
By learning Mythological stories one fears sinning and become religious.
A:
Both of these occur out of weakness. Once the nature of punya and pap are known
with cause and effect then there is strengthening of belief. Hence you should
practice this.
2. Supporter
of Charananuyoga says: what is the use of learning about Jivas and
karmas? If one discards violence and practice fasting , tapa, worship of
Arihant etc and give charity and detaches from the world then it would be
beneficial to soul. Hence preach of charananuyoga (conduct).
Reply: O ignorant
one ! You have mentioned fasting etc meritorious deeds, they are worthy ones.
But without the right belief all of them are like zero without prefixed number.
Without knowing the nature of Jiva , the belief is like the child of a sterile woman.
The learning of nature of Jiva etc is practice of knowledge and is meritorious
deed which accrues great punya. After learning the types of Jiva forms and then
avoid violence towards them and then fast, then you can be the follower of vows in proper sense. Without
knowing the forms of Jivas , avoiding violence in some respect is not proper
following of vow. It is essential to know them.
Further tapa are of two types: external and internal. Where the body is stressed
, that is external and where mind is suppressed that is internal. The internal
tapa is superior. Fasting and all are only external, but practice of knowledge
is internal. In Siddhanta scripture also, out of six types of internal tapa ,
studies of scripture is fourth. Superior to that is only meditation. By
learning of Gunasthana etc one realizes the form of Arihant etc. and our own
form also. Then only the devotion is intense and purposeful. The devotion out
of family traditions is superficial and provides minor punya benefits. Hence in
devotion also studies are superior.
Further charity is of four kinds: food, medicine,
life saving, and knowledge. The first three provide benefits only for the
current incarnation but knowledge serves for several incarnations hence is
superior. Therefore studying self and assisting others is superior form of
charity.
People become detached due to occurrence of some misfortune
and fruition of inauspicious karmas and then practice penance but that only
results in accruing auspicious karmas but not Moksha. For true detachment also
the practice of knowledge is essential. Even great saints indulge in studies
and mediation only.
Q : So many people do studies but do not give up sensual pleasures, then
whether the studies are beneficial or not ? If so then why saints give up those
pleasures? If not then how studies could be beneficial ?
A: The studies of scriptures is with
two types of motives – one is greed and other is dharma. The first one studies
with the objective of fame, money, worship etc. He does not give up pleasures. Even if he does,
it is due to greed, therefore the studies are not beneficial.
But the one who studies due to internal
conviction, he is true follower. As it is the Jain scriptures motivate to give
up sensual pleasures, so he also does the same. If due to fruition of past
karmas, he is not able to give up the pleasures, then also due to right belief
and right knowledge, the studies are beneficial like that in 4th
gunasthana for Avirat Samyakdrishti.
Q: The one who studies scriptures for religious benefits should necessarily
give up pleasures since otherwise is not possible. The enjoyment of pleasures
is due to manifestation of past karmas and those are in our own control ?
A : The manifestations are of two kinds- one is with knowledge and second
without knowledge. That which occurs in accordance with intent is with
knowledge, and that which occurs without intent due to fruition of karmas, is without
knowledge. Just as during samayik prayer one devotee intends to keep pure
thoughts and if that really happens then it is with knowledge. However if due
to fruition of karmas, the thoughts are perturbed and polluted then it is
without knowledge. Same way the true devotee practices studies of scriptures
for attaining detachment. If that happens then it is with knowledge. However if
due to fruition of charitra moha karmas, the manifestation is not pure , it is
without knowledge. For them the indulgence is seen on account of their
weakness.
Q : If such is the case then we can also indulge and claim that karmas are
fructifying in this manner?
A : O fool! Just by saying so, things don’t happen. The results are in
accordance with intent. Hence practice scriptures to purify the intent. If
internally the intent is corrupted then one cannot be called devotee.
3.
Supporter
of Dravyanuyoga says: In this
scripture the emphasis is on Gunasthan and karmas etc which cause mental waves which are not
beneficial. Experiencing the pure self and discriminating between self and
others is the main objective hence the adhyatma is more meaningful to study.
Reply : O great Logical minded ! What you said is true but look at your own
state! If you can experience the self or discriminate with respect to others at
all times then why do anything else? Enjoy the pleasure of experiencing the
self. But unfortunately in the lower state of self such manifestation is not
feasible. The mind keeps diverting in different directions. Hence whenever the
mind does not indulge in contemplation of self, engage it in knowing subjects
like Gunasthan etc.
Even the study of adhyatma in general is not
beneficial. It requires understanding in detail the forms of Jiva and karmas
and their relationship. Therefore even from that objective the study of
scriptures is beneficial.
Q : In philosophical literature the emphasis is on experiencing the self
without contemplating of Gunasthan etc which cause perturbation of mind. This
is contradictory to what is described in this text?
A: The viewpoints are of two kinds: one is real and other is practical. In
reality the Jivas are beyond differentiation of Gunasthan etc a singular pure
self. However in practical view they are belonging to different Gunasthan.
Those who are meditating on the self , for them the pure nature of self is
singular and undivided. However for
those who have not reached that stage, or those who have dropped from
experience stage to one where mind is active again; in such impure state the
practical viewpoint of learning is beneficial.
Further if your manifestation is not in mediation
state and you do not contemplate of subjects of Gunasthan etc considering them
to be disturbance of mind , then where else will you indulge? Obviously in
impure thoughts leading to accrual of inauspicious karmas.
Further listen! In general even Vedant Shastra
calls Jiva to be pure. How will you decide the right or wrong without knowing
the specific details like Gunasthana and corrupted states of Jiva ? Then only
your contemplation would be pure and conviction strong&unshakable.
Q : What you say may be true, but in
spite of knowing karananuyoga scriptures the Dravyalingi muni remains worldly
without experience of the self, and even animals are able to attain right
belief with very little knowledge of philosophy. Even Shivabhuti Muni attained
Moksha with just the knowledge of self and others. Hence rather than indulging
in exercise of mind , we would concentrate on philosophy alone.
A: You gave example of Drvyalingi Muni. He knows karanuyoga as well as
Adhyatma Shastra also. But due to fruition of Mithyatva (wrong belief) he
practices otherwise then what can scripture do ? Scriptures do not contradict
each other.
In both Karananuyoga as well as Adhyatma Shastra
the impure bhavas of soul are described as due to fruition of karmas as
catalyst. Dravyalingi muni manifests as owner of them . Although body related all auspicious
and inauspicious acts are described as caused by matter, the Dravyalingi
believes them to be his own and attempts to own and discard them. Further he
believes auspicious karmas to be cause of Samvar, Nirjara, Moksha contrary to
their being described as cause of Asrava. He does not even recognize the pure
bhavas which are real cause of Samvar,
Nirjara and Moksha. Thus he practices contrary to what is written so the
scriptures cannot be blamed.
Further you said that even animal gain samyak
darshan without much knowledge, it is due to their efforts of previous
manifestations or the specifics of their knowledge. Just as someone discovers a
hidden wealth , we cannot give up working or business to earn wealth. Same way we cannot give up making efforts for
right belief because someone managed without effort because that is not the
correct path. Right path is that on which knowing the reality of all tatvas (elements)
the objective is achieved.
If you say that due to my weakness the exercise of
mind cannot be done then you should practice as much as you can. In indulging
in pap you are expert but here you say that the mind does not function, it is
symptomatic of evil person.
4.
Supporter
of scriptures says: It is
meaningful to learn grammar, logic, metaphor, poetry etc. by which one can
learn more shastras and own importance is gained as Pandit. Here there is no
such gain.
Reply: If you desire to be called as
Pandit then you practice those books but if you desire Moksha then practicing
Jain Scriptures is appropriate.
Q : I learn grammar etc. to practice those Jain scriptures.
A : That is fine but you cannot spend all the time in learning grammar
without gaining samyaktva etc. Otherwise the objective is lost. In these
periods the age is less and wisdom is low, hence practice keeping objective in
mind. There is no dearth of scriptures. You will find many experts with great
knowledge of adhyatma without knowing grammar. Hence concentrate in what is
most beneficial within the short time available to you.
5.
Supporter
of Money says : what is the
use of all this learning without money?
With money you can do all charity and perform religious activities. You can
call all Pandits to preach hence one should make effort to make more money.
Reply: O evil doer ! Money does not come by itself. It comes because of fate. If
money has to come, it will come in spite of reading scriptures and that is
called destiny. If money is not in your fate then it will not come whatever you
do. The riches are dependent on fruition of previous punya karmas. Further
money is transient, cause of fear, pap generating and cause of Narak etc. On
the other hand study of scriptures is riches of knowledge, permanent, without
fear, dharma and cause of heaven etc. If you think of money generation only
then you are bound for infinite transmigrations.
6.
Supporter
of sensual pleasures says:
Enjoying life, marrying, eating drinking making merry is the right objective of
life.
Reply : All these are forms of suffering.
The objects of pleasures are dependent on nimitta and lead to tensions. Further they are cause of perturbation to
self, gives birth in hell etc. Things do not occur as per your wish but are
dependent on past punya karmas. Just as a person suffering from itching keeps
scratching himself and still the itching does not vanish, the fulfillment of
desires is also like that. One is not satisfied with whatever is achieved.
Hence they are not cause of happiness but source of sorrow only.
On the other hand study of scriptures is cause for
internal happiness, removes tensions and leads to Moksha. Hence you should practice that as
much as possible to your capability.
7.
Follower
of other religions says: why
do you preach of your scriptures only ?
In our religions also there are scriptures on logic etc. Why do you not preach them ?
Reply : In your scriptures the preaching is not for the benefit of the soul.
Somewhere it is for beauty, somewhere for wars, somewhere for sensual pleasures
and elsewhere for violence. These are being practiced even without preaching.
The benefit lies in discarding them but they encourage those activities so how
can they be beneficial to soul?
Q: God has created such illusions which we describe for our benefit?
A: God must not be having happiness
in the soul therefore he created the illusions of the world etc. to make himself
happy. If he were peaceful then why talk of sensual pleasures and violence?
Even ignorant do anything with some objective in mind. Here it appears that God
is also worldly like us then why to praise him ?
Q: In our scriptures also there are sermons on detachment, non violence etc.
A: Those sermons are contradictory. Somewhere pleasures are promoted and
elsewhere negated, similarly detachment is talked and violence is preached.
What is the truth?
Q: In Vedant scripture also there is description of Tatvas ( elements).
A: Those do not stand to logic and therefore unreal. In Jain logic
scriptures their mistakes are described. Hence there is no purpose in studying
scriptures of other religions.
8.
Finally
the benefits of reading Jain scriptures : Leads to experience of soul in due course which ultimately results in
Moksha. Immediate benefits are as follows:
1) Reduction of passions of anger etc.
2) Reduction of desires in objects of five senses. 3) Even the wandering
mind is able to concentrate. 4) Stoppage
of violence etc. type five evils. 5)
Even with limited knowledge one gets to know of the elements of this endless universe.
6) Recognition of right and wrong deeds. 7) Contemplation of the soul 8) Better knowledge leads to happiness of the
soul 9) Name and fame in the community
10) Accrual of beneficial punya karmas.
Further the opportunities for study of scripture are extremely rare. Why ?
For these reasons-
From one sense to four sense Jivas
are without mind end even in five sensed one there are Jivas without mind. In
Jivas with mind the Naraki are in pain , animals are without understanding,
Devas are busy with pleasures and men get limited opportunity hence study of scripture
is rare. Even getting human manifestation is extremely rare since their numbers
are countable while others are innumerable and Nigod Jivas are infinite. From
the age point of view also human age is limited compared to other Jivas. Area wise
also humans are in limited area far less than that occupied by other Jivas.
Finally from bhava point of view also getting right type of bhavas resulting in
human birth are rare. Therefore it is very difficult to get the birth in such
Karma Bhoomi wherein one could get to read scriptures. Further it is seen that
there are hindrances due to health, company, knowledge, age , family etc. So if
you have got this opportunity by extreme fortune then I advise you to study scriptures at whatever the cost and
make others also do the same. Promote and assist others in whichever way.
Nice commentary by you sir
ReplyDeleteI'm fan of pandit todarmalji