Now
disciple again enquires that why the person experiencing two activities is
Mithyadrishti ? That is replied next:
Gatha 86 : If someone says that
soul only indulges in the bhavas of the self as well as pudgala , then such
people are Mithydrishti describing two
activities as one.
Commentary : Definitely those who believe that soul is the karta
of the manifestations of self and pudgala, they are Mithyadrishti only,
believing two activities are being conducted by one alone. Such is the
principle. Hence one dravya should not appear to be manifesting in two forms.
Just
as the potter appears to be indulging in the activities of hand etc. conducive
for making of the pot and the desire of making a pot indifferent from the
manifestation of self. Although the potter has the ego of being the maker of
the pot; even so the manifestation of pot from the mud occurs in accordance
with the manifestation of the mud and is indifferent from the activities of the
mud. The potter does not appear to be responsible for the manifestation of pot.
In
the same way, the soul also appears to be manifesting in the acts of ignorance,
in accordance with manifestation of pudgala karma, indifferent with his own
manifestations. Although that ignorant jiva has the ego of indulging in
manifestation of pudgala, even so the manifestations of pudgala occur in
accordance with the pudgala
manifestations and indifferent from pudgala. The ignorant jiva does not
appear to be responsible for the manifestations of pudgala.
Explanation:
Soul appears to be responsible for his own
manifestations but not the manifestations of pudgala. Therefore the one who
believes the soul to be responsible for the acts of soul as well as pudgala is
called Mithydrishti. If sentient and insentient indulge in single activity then
all dravya would be interchangeable resulting in destruction of all which would
be a great flaw.
The
same is conveyed in the next kalash :
Shloka 51 : The one that manifests is the karta, that
manifestation is the karma, and act of manifesting if the kriya (act). All the
three are not different from the substance.
Explanation:
From the aspect
of dravya, the one manifesting and manifestation are indifferent but from the
aspect of paryaya , both are different. From the aspect of differentiation, the
karta, karma and kriya are different , but from the aspect of reality which
does not differentiate , the three karta, karma, and kriya are three states of
the same dravya. They are not different substances having different spaces.
Further it is said :
Shloka 52: It is always the one substance which is
manifesting, in that one only manifestation takes place, from one state to next
state occurs, and in that one only the kriya of manifesting happens. In spite
of being several the substance is one only. There is no differentiation within
that.
Explanation : One substance
has several paryayas which are called manifestations also, states also. From
the aspect of name, numbers, characteristics, objectives, they all appear
to be different. Even then they are one substance, not different. Such is the
nature of substance having different –indifferent form. Again it is said :
Shloka 53 : Two dravyas do not manifest together, two dravyas
do not have same manifestation and the kriya of manifesting is also not same in
two dravyas. Several substances remain several only and they do not change into
one.
Explanation : Two substances
are always different and they are spatially separated. Neither they can join
together to manifest as one, nor can they produce one result, and nor can they
have same kriya because such is the rule. If two dravyas could manifest as one,
then all dravyas would vanish.
The
same is strengthened with following :
Shloka 54 : There cannot be two kartas for one dravya, one
dravya cannot have two karmas, and one dravya cannot have two kriyas also.
Because one dravya can not become several.
Explanation
: From
the aspect of reality this is the principle. The same should be treated as one
from shuddha Dravyarthik naya.
Now it is said that the soul
has eternal ignorance with respect to other dravyas regarding karta-karma
relationship. If by adopting the reality, even once it is destroyed, then it
would not appear again.
Shloka
55: In this world, the deluded ignorant jiva has been believing that “ I
perform the acts of other dravyas” – such an ego of being karta of other dravya in the form of blind ignorance has been prevalent since beginingless times.
How
is that blind ignorance? – It is great and impenetrable. It cannot be overcome
easily. Hence Acharya says that the shuddha dravyarthik naya form non differentiable naya is real and true.
Once recourse to that is taken and even once if the blind ignorance is
destroyed then on experiencing the true knowledge within the block of knowledge
form jiva, whether the knowledge would go away ? – No! and if the knowledge does not go
away then how can there be bondage due
to ignorance? –Never.
Explanation
: Here
the implication is that the ignorance is eternal only but once with the
destruction of darshan moha , the true kshyayik samyaktva is generated then
Mithyatva would never appear again. Once Mithyatva is gone and it cannot be
bonded again than how can there be
bondage of the world?- one attains Moksha only – so it should be known.
Further it is specially said
:
Shloka
56: The soul does his own bhavas and other dravya does others’ own bhavas, because
own bhavas are soul only and others’ bhavas are others. – such is the
rule.
Earlier the belief of being
karta-karma of others was called
ignorance and it was said that those who believe this way are Mithyadrishti.
From this a doubt arises that what exactly are the mithyatva etc bhavas? If they
are called as manifestation of Jiva then
it is contradictory to earlier statement of calling the bhavas of raga etc as
manifestation of pudgala. If they are called manifestations of pudgala then why
should Jiva be penalized for their fruition since Jiva had nothing to do with
them ? Therefore to remove such doubts the next gatha is stated:
Gatha
87 : In previous gatha the one believing to be indulging in acts of two was
deemed Mithysdrishti. Now in continuation it is said that Mithyatva is of two
types-one is Jiva Mithyatva and other is Ajiva Mithyatva. In the same way
ignorance is also of two kinds- Jiva ignorance and Ajiva ignorance. In the same
way the avirati, yoga, moha, krodha ( anger) etc. passions – all these bhavas
are two types each in respect of Jiva and Ajiva.
Commentary
: Mithyadarshan,
ignorance, avirati etc. bhavas are generated by Jiva and Ajiva both, hence they are Jiva as well as Ajiva
like the peacock and the mirror. It is further clarified- Just as the blue,
black, green, yellow etc. colour form bhavas are generated out of own nature of
peacock hence they are peacock only. Further when their image is seen in the mirror then the same colours
are generated out of the corruption of purity and cleanliness of the mirror
hence they are mirror only since there is total difference between the mirror
and the peacock.
In the same way,
Mithyadarshan, ignorance, avirati etc. bhavas are generated by the ajiva out of its own ajiva dravya nature
hence they are ajiva only. Further Mithyadarshan, ignorance, avirat etc bhavas
generated by the corruption of conscious nature of jiva are Jiva only.
Explanation
: Jiva
manifests into vibhava (corrupted) form like Mithyatva etc. with the nimitta of
karmas. These vibhavas are corrupted form of Chetan (consciousness) hence Jiva
only. Further those atoms of pudgala which manifest in the form of Mithyatva
etc. karma , whose fruition result in the form of experience , are ajiva
Mithyatva etc. In this manner Mithyatva etc. bhavas are of two types namely
Jiva and Ajiva.
It should be understood that
Mithyatva etc. are forms of Karmas. These are pudgala atoms, which manifest in
fruition form. Jiva is of the nature of Upayoga ( consciousness). It is the
nature of purity of Upayoga that when karma particles are fructifying then the
Upayoga also manifests in the form according to the taste of the fruition. Jiva
being ignorant without differentiating knowledge , feels that taste to be his
own bhava. After attaining differentiating knowledge, he knows the Jiva bhava
to be Jiva and the Ajiva bhava to be Ajiva , then with the destruction of
Mithyatva he attains Samyaktva.
Now question is “ which all
are the Mithyatva etc in the forms of Jiva and Ajiva ?” In reply the next gatha
is stated:
Gatha
88: The Mithyavta,Yoga, Avirati and Agyan (ignorance) of Ajiva form are
pudgala karma. Further the agyan, Avirati and Mithyatva of Jiva are of Upayoga form.
Commentary
: In
reality the Mithya darshan, agyan, avirati of Ajiva type are corporeal
different from the non- corporeal manifestation of consciousness. Hence they
are pudgala karmas. Further the Mithyadarshan, Agyan Avirati of Jiva form are
corruption of consciousness being different from the corporeal pudgala karmas.
Again question is that how
the Jiva-Mithyatva etc. are cause for corruption of conscious manifestation? In
reply this gatha is stated:
Gatha
89 : From eternal times the Upayoga
of the soul is corrupted by three kinds of manifestations – Mithyatva, Agyan
and Avirati because the soul is deluded from beginingless time and these
manifestations occur on account of its nimitta.
Commentary
: In reality all the substances have the capability
to manifest in accordance with its own nature. In spite of it, the Upayoga of
soul is conjoined with other substance Moha from eternal times resulting in
Mithyatva, Agyan and Avirati – these three types of corruption in
manifestation. Just as an inherently pure
sapphire gem is seen to have corrupted manifestation on account of
nimitta of other substances. The same is clarified as below:
The sapphire stone is
capable of manifesting in its pure bright form. In spite of that, at some time
on account of the blue, green or yellow pot in which it is kept, it appears to
have blue , green or yellow forms of corrupted manifestation. In the same
manner the Upayoga of the soul is conjoined from eternal times with other pudgala
substances which have natures of
Mithyatva, Agyan and Avirati resulting in the three types of corrupted
manifestations of Mithyava, Agyan and Avirati.
Explanation
: From
beginingless times the Upayoga of soul manifests in the three corrupted forms
due to the nimitta of karmas. It’s not that the soul was pure earlier and has
become corrupted later. If such were the case then even the Siddhas should have
newly corrupt manifestations- but such is not the case.
Now the soul is shown to be
the doer of the three types of corrupted manifestations in next gatha:
Gatha
90 : In spite of having the nimitta of the three- Mithyatva, Agyan and
Avirati from eternal times, from real aspect of view the upayoga of soul is
one, pure, uncorrupted ; even then he manifests in the three forms of
Mithyadarshan, Agyan and Avirati. Whatever corrupted manifestation the soul
indulges in, he is the karta of the same.
Commentary
: In
the previous gatha three types of manifestations of Upayoga were described.
These have been nimitta for the corrupted manifestation of the soul in the form
of Mithyadarshan, Agyan and Avirati from eternal times in conjunction with Moha
of other objects. From real aspect of view the soul is pure, supreme, permanent
having singular conscious nature bhava. However he manifests in the form of impure, flawed,
several bhava forms of the three types, being ignorant and karta of the corrupt
bhavas. Thus whichever bhava he manifests in, he is the karta of the same for
sure.
Explanation
: Earlier
it was told that whoever manifests he is
the karta. Here the upayoga manifested in ignorant form , therefore whichever
bhava he manifested in, he is the karta of the same bhava. From shuddha
Dravyarthik Naya the soul is not a karta but here upayoga(paryaya) has been called karta and since upayoga and
soul are one and the same hence soul himself is called karta.
Now, in spite of the soul
having the ownership of the manifestation of the three types of corrupted
states , the pudgala dravya itself manifests in karma form as stated below:
Gatha
91 : Whichever bhava the soul indulges in , he is the karta of the same
bhava. Along with soul the pudgala dravya
also manifests on its own in karma form.
Commentary
: In reality whichever bhava the soul manifests in, he is the karta of
that bhava like the practitioner of Mantra. Further with the nimitta of the
bhava of the soul, the pudgala dravya also manifests in karma form on its own.
The same is clarified below:
Just as a person,
practitioner of Mantra (hymn) manifests
in the form of Dhyan (concentration) and thus he is the karta of that Dhyan.
Now on account of the nimitta of such Dhyan , due to prevailing of the right
conditions for a thing to happen, without assistance of the practitioner, the
problem of snake bite gets automatically resolved, women become widows on their
own, shackles get opened on their own.
Thus several deeds get done on their own by practicing the Mantra in Dhyan
form.
In the same manner when the
soul is karta of the Mithyadarshan etc. bhavas out of ignorance then on account of the nimitta of the
Mithyadarshan etc. bhavas being favourable, without assistance of the soul (
who is karta of those bhavas) , the pudgala dravya itself manifests in Mohaniya
etc. karma forms.
Explanation
: The
soul manifests in the ignorant form having attachment with someone, raga with
another, hatred with another; thus he is the karta of all such bhavas on his own.
With the nimitta of such bhavas, the pudgala dravya itself manifests into karma
form of its own bhava. This is the nimitta-naimittik relationship between the
two. In any case both of them are kartas of their own bhavas. That is the
reality.
Now ignorance only causes
the generation of karma – that is explained below:
Gatha
92 : Being ignorant himself, the Jiva
manifests in the form of others and makes others manifest into form of self.
Thus he manifests as karta of karmas.
Commentary
: This
soul, with visible ignorance without knowing the difference between the self
and others, believes others as self and self as others. In this manner with his
own ignorance he manifests as karta of karmas. The same is clarified below:
Just as the manifestation of
pudgala in hot and cold form resulting
in experiences of hot or cold conditions is indifferent from pudgala and always
entirely different from the soul. In the same way the manifestations of pudgala
in the forms of raga-dwesha, sukha-dukha etc. resulting in experiences of
raga-dwesha, sukha-dukha are indifferent from pudgala and always entirely
different from the soul. Further on account of nimitta of such manifestation
the resulting experiences of raga-dwesha etc. are indifferent from the soul and
always entirely different from pudgala.
Even then out of ignorance
and lack of differentiating knowledge, the soul believes the raga-dwesha etc.
and their experiences to be his own. Just as soul cannot manifest in cold or
hot forms, in the same way soul cannot manifest in raga-dwesha, sukha-dukha
forms on his own. Even then the raga-dwesha etc. states of pudgala
manifestations are experienced by the ignorant soul on account of their nimitta
resulting in his manifesting in raga-dwesha, agyana form etc. ; then displaying his own ignorance and being
ignorant, “I am that raagi” , in this manner appears to be the doer of all the
raga etc. karmas.
Explanation
: Raga-dwesha, sukha-dukha etc states are the tastes
of the fruition of pudgala karmas, hence they are indifferent from pudgala
karma and entirely different from soul; just as hot or cold conditions are
entirely different from the soul. The
soul does not have differentiating knowledge on account of his ignorance, hence
he believes that these are his own experiences, because the purity of the soul
is such that the experiences of
raga-dwesha are imaged like those of heat or cold in the knowledge and appear
as if they are knowledge forms only. Therefore
out of such ignorance the Jiva is proven to be doer of those deeds because he
has believed himself to be raagi, dweshi, krodhi (angry), maani (proud) etc.
Thus the ignorant jiva is the karta.
No comments:
Post a Comment