Preface
Yogsar Prabhrat was
written by Acharya Amitgati-I sometime in 10th century AD. Not much
is known about him except that his Guru was Acharya Devasen who himself was disciple of Achrya
Veersen renowned author of Dhavala and Jaidhavala. Acharya Amitgati-II who was the author of Dharma Pareeksha, Panch Sangrah
etc., was the disciple of disciple’s
disciple of Acharya Amitgati-I.
The subject matter of Yogsar Prabhrat is adhyatma which
covers almost the entire range of
paramagams written by Acharya Kunda kunda. On the other hand the verses
are simple and self explanatory. In my view this Shastra enables one to get
comprehensive knowledge of the dravyanuyoga as well as charananuyoga since its
chapters deal with all the tatvas as well as charitra. In this translation most
of the gathas are self explanatory. However some comments are provided to
simplify further wherever useful.
The name Yogsar Prabhrat stands for the presentation of
essence of yoga i.e. dhyan (meditation). Thus the main objective of the book is
to enable one to contemplate of the soul. The emphasis is more upon the
Nishchaya naya while Vyavahara is described so as to be known which essentially
would be present but not cherishable.
Yogsar Prabhrat comprises of 540 gathas which are divided into nine Adhikars. First seven are pertaining to seven tatvas i.e. Jiva , Ajiva, Asrava, Bandh, Samvar, Nirjara, Moksha. The eighth Adhikar is Charitra which covers the conduct and Ninth Adhikar is choolika which covers what was not included so far. In this manner this shastra is quite comprehensive from all aspects. It is envisaged to complete about 30 gathas per instalment of the blog. Hope the readers will also find it useful.
Yogsar Prabhrat comprises of 540 gathas which are divided into nine Adhikars. First seven are pertaining to seven tatvas i.e. Jiva , Ajiva, Asrava, Bandh, Samvar, Nirjara, Moksha. The eighth Adhikar is Charitra which covers the conduct and Ninth Adhikar is choolika which covers what was not included so far. In this manner this shastra is quite comprehensive from all aspects. It is envisaged to complete about 30 gathas per instalment of the blog. Hope the readers will also find it useful.
1. Jiva Adhikar
Invocation by the author and
objective of the Shastra:
1. For attainment of my own nature, I (Acharya Amitgati)
offer obeisance to the Siddhas who are pure, devoid of impurities of passions,
knowledgeable, indestructible, unchangeable, permanent and always stationary
within their own nature.
Benefits of knowing Jiva Ajiva
tatvas :
2. Since in this world, barring the Jiva and Ajiva,
nothing else exists; hence for knowing our own nature, the characteristics of
these two should be learnt.
3. The one who knows the form of both Jiva and Ajiva by
means of their characteristics; by discarding Ajiva he gets immersed within
Jiva Tatva.
4. The one who gets immersed in Jiva tatva, his raga-dwesha
(attachment-aversion) get destroyed. The destruction of raga-dwesha lead to
prevention of influx of karmas and bondage which leads to attainment of
Nirvana.
Benefit of knowing own nature:
5. The one who knows
his own nature different from
other dravyas, he does not have any
attachment or aversion towards any of the states of other dravyas.
Upayoga – the characteristics of
soul and its types:
6. Out of the two Jiva and Ajiva, Jinendra Deva has told
the characteristics of Jiva i.e.soul as Upayoga (consciousness). This Upayoga is of two types which are Gyan
(knowledge) and darshan (vision).
Characteristics of Darshanopayoga
and its types:
7. In the upayoga characteristics of JIva, the
darshanopayoga senses the general existence of substance. It can be divided
into four types as Chakshu darshan, Achakshu darshan, Avadhi darshan and Keval
darshan.
Comment: Every substance by nature is general-specific.
Darshanopayoga accepts the general undivided nature of the substance while
gyanopayoga knows the specifics of the substance.
Characteristics of Gyanopayoga
and its types:
8. Gyanopayoga comprises of five types of samyak gyans.
These are Mati gyan, Sruta gyan, Avadhi gyan, ManahParyaya gyan and Keval Gyan.
This gyan senses the specifics of the substance.
9. Mithya Gyan comprises of Kumati gyan, Kusruta gyan and
Vibhang gyan. Thus Gyanopayoga is said to be totally eight kinds.
Comment : In reality
knowledge is knowledge only and cannot be samyak of Mithya. But in conjunction
with wrong belief it is termed as Samyak or Mithya. The reason for this is that
while the Mithya drishti may know all external substances correctly , still he
does not know the self hence his knowledge is deemed to be Mithya.
Cause for generation of Keval
gyan and Keval Darshan:
10. While Keval gyan and Keval darshan are
revealed/unobscured upon destruction of Mohaniya, Gyanavaran, Darshanavaran and
Antaraya karmas; the remaining three
Achakshu etc. darshans and Mati
etc. seven Gyans are revealed upon Kshayopasham (subsidence cum destruction) of
Mohaniya, Gyanavarana, Darshanavaran and Antaraya karmas.
Comment: In reality all dravyas are independent and one
dravya does not change other dravyas nature. However these statements represent
the Vyavahara since the presence of
Keval gyan also imply the absence of bondage of karmas. The presence of karmas functions
as nimitta for the non-revelation of keval gyan and revelation of other seven
types of gyans.
The sequence of generation of
Darshan and Gyan:
11. The two upayogas of the soul namely keval gyan and
keval darshan are generated simultaneously. Remaining three darshans and seven
gyans are generated sequentially. None of the darshans are generated along with corresponding gyan; the
gyan always follows the darshan.
Causes for Mithyagyan and Samyak
Gyan:
12. In Jain philosophy, the Gyan is believed to be Mithya gyan with the Nimitta of Mithyatva
and Samyak Gyan with the nimitta of Samyaktva.
The form of Mithyatva and its
function:
13. The reason due
to which the knowledge of a thing appears deluded/corrupted is called Mithyatva by the wise people. This Mithyatva
functions as water for the irrigation of the karmas form garden.
Three divisions of Darshan
Mohaniya karma:
14. Generated due to fruition of Darshan Mohaniya karma,
that Mithyatva is said to be of three types namely Gruheet, Agruheet and
Sanshayik.
Comment: These
details are well described in Moksha Marg Prakashak.
Form of Mithyatva:
15. A jiva influenced by Mithyatva belives the non tatva
to be tatva. Does a person intoxicated
by Datura not see non gold as gold? Surely he does.
Comment: From eternal
times the Jiva has never known the nature of self and believed body etc. to be
the soul and passions, desires to be his own. This is the Mithyatva (delusion).
Form of Samyaktva:
16. In whichever form a thing exists, the reason by
which it is known correctly in that
form is called Samyaktva by Jinendra
Deva. That Samyaktva is the means for realization of the soul.
Comment: One of the qualities of Jiva is belief which is
eternally deluded. The manifestation in correct form is known as Samyaktva.
Divisions of Samyaktva and their
Cause effect relationship:
17,18. That Samyaktva is of three types namely Kshayik,
Aupashamik and Kshayopashamik respectively by the destruction, subsidence and
destruction cum subsidence of the seven kinds of Mohaniya karma which comprise
of three types of Darshan Mohaniya which are Mithyatva, Samyak Mithyatva and
Samyak Prakriti respectively and four types of Charitra Mohaniya which are
Anantanubandhi anger-pride-deceit-greed.
Of the three types of Samyaktva the Kshayik Samyaktva is the desirable
objective and remaining two Aupashamik Samyaktva and Kshayopashamik Samyaktva are the means.
Comment: Readers are advised to look up Moksha Marg
Prakashak for these details.
Relation between soul and
knowledge and the range of knowledge:
19. Jinendra Deva has told the soul to be equivalent to the
knowledge i.e. of the range of knowledge while knowledge is equivalent to the objects
of knowledge i.e. of the range of objects of knowledge. Since objects of
knowledge are of the form of Lokaloka ( comprising of all objects of Lokakash
and Alokakash) hence knowledge is all pervasive (omniscient).
Comment: The soul has capability of knowing all i.e.
being omniscient but in worldly state due to the nimitta of karmas , his
knowledge is vastly restricted in the seven forms described above. Only when
the ghati karmas are destroyed then the keval gyan is revealed knowing all substances and their all manifestations for
all times (past, present, future)
simultaneously.
Objection in believing soul to be
less than knowledge:
20. If it is considered that Knowledge or objects of
knowledge are greater than the soul then the soul and the knowledge cannot have
objective and its characteristics relationship.
Comment: Jinendra deva has told knowledge as the
characteristics of soul by which it is defined. If soul is larger than the
knowledge then some part of soul will be without knowledge which goes against
the definition of soul. On the other hand if knowledge is larger than the soul
then that extra knowledge cannot have existence without soul knowing it. Hence
it establishes that soul is equivalent to knowledge.
The pervasive nature of knowledge
with respect to objects of knowledge:
21. Just as the blue sapphire stone lying within the milk
illuminates the milk totally in all directions ; in the same way the knowledge
pervading objects of knowledge illuminates all objects of knowledge totally by
means of all pervasive knowledge.
Comment: Keval gyan knows all objects of knowledge
without going to them without leaving the soul space. In fact knowing the
objects is deemed to be Vyavahara while knowing the self within which all
objects are revealed is the Nishchaya.
In spite of knowing the objects
of knowledge, the knowledge does not become one with them:
22. Just as eye observing colour or shape does not take
the form of that colour or shape , in
the same way the knowledge knowing the object of knowledge does not become of
the form of object of knowledge but remains knowledge form.
Comment: If knowledge becomes same as object of
knowledge then omniscient would experience all the miseries of all the jivas
also which is not true. He knows all the sufferings remaining detached from
them.
Knowledge has capability of
knowing distant objects also:
23. The knowledge knows the distant objects from the
aspect of distance or time by its own nature. Does a magnet not pull a distant
iron piece not towards itself? Surely it does.
Comment: Omniscience does not have restriction of size,
distance or time of the object. If it is object of knowledge then it shall be
known.
Knowledge by nature illuminates the self as well as others:
24. The knowledge knows itself as well as the objects by
its own nature. Just as a lamp illuminates the objects and does not require any
other means to illuminates itself.
Comment : Here it establishes
the fact that just as lamp does not need somebody else to illuminate the lamp itself, in the same way knowledge does not need
somebody else to know the knower.
Form of Kshayopashamik and
Kshayik gyan:
25. Upon destruction of Mohaniya etc. four types of Ghati
karmas, the kshayopashamik knowledge of the Jiva gets destroyed and the pure
kshayik knowledge i.e. keval gyan gets revealed i.e. it remain in fruition
forever.
Comment: Kshayopashamik gyans are the lower order four
gyans while with the destruction of four ghati karmas the Kshayik gyan is
revealed which lasts forever.
The capability of Keval gyan with
respect to existing- non existing objects:
26. Unobscured and greatest Kshayik Gyan knows all the existing-non
existing objects of all three times i.e. past, present and future
simultaneously.
Explanation of existing-non
existing objects:
27. The objects which existed in the three lokas in the
past and those which shall exist in the
future, they are considered as non-existing objects by wise people. The objects which are
existing at present are believed to be existent.
Comment: Present is for the duration of one samay when
a thing is existent. Non existing are the manifestations expired in the past
and the manifestations that shall occur in future. It may be noted that while
past is of infinite duration, the future is infinite times that of past.
Form of the past and future
objects known:
28. All the objects of the past and future which existed/will
exist in whichever form in their own
times; keval gyan knows them in those forms only identically to the
presently existing objects.
Comment: This establishes that the past and future
objects are knows unambiguously without loss of clarity.
What is the fallacy if Keval gyan
does not know all objects simultaneously:
29-30. If keval gyan does not know all the objects
together simultaneously then that keval gyan shall not know even one object at
any time; since even one object manifests into infinite paryayas(forms). How
long it would take to know all those paryayas(forms) sequentially , please
tell? Since the paryayas of even one
object are infinitely never ending, even
one object can never be known totally.
Continued……..