Jiva is non doer of moha etc.
form manifestations:
91. If it is accepted that impure manifestations of moha-raga-dwesha are cause for gyanavarana
etc. karmas then how can jiva be karta(doer)
for gyanavarana etc. dravya karmas? Surely cannot be, since Jiva cannot
manifest in forms other than gyan-darshan etc. which are his own nature.
The nimitta-naimittik
relationship between dravya karma and bhava karma:
92. With the nimitta of fruition of Mohaniya dravya
karma, impure manifestations of Jiva in the form of moha-raga-dwesha always
takes place. Similarly, with the nimitta of impure manifestations of jiva in
the form of moha-raga-dwesha, the gyanavarana etc. eight karmas i.e. 148 types
of dravya karmas are generated. In this manner there is
nimitta-naimittik relationship between dravya karmas and bhava karmas.
Why gyanavarana etc. dravya
karmas are attributed to be carried out by jiva:
93. Just as a war won by warriors is said to be won by
the king from the aspect of Vyavahara naya, in the same way karmas are also
attributed to the jiva which are carried out with anger etc. passionate bhavas
i.e. impure manifestations of moha-raga-dwesha etc. vibhava bhavas from the
aspect of vyavahara naya.
The various features of the body
of the jiva are karma generated and non conscious:
94. The various Vibhavas i.e. impure states of worldly
jiva in the form of body, sanhanan, sansthan, gati , jati etc. are all
generated with the nimitta of naam karma and are devoid of consciousness.
Comment: Even manifestation in the form of Tirthankara
is due to fruition of Tirthankara naam karma which is non conscious.
The various gunasthanas are
generated out of pudgala:
95-96. The Tatva Gyanis have described thirteen
gunasthanas as Mithya drishti, Sasadan, Mishra, Asanyat Samyak drishti, Desh
Virat, Pramatta Virat, Apramatta, Apoorvakaran, Anivrattikaran, Sookshma
Samparaya, Upashanta Moha, Ksheen Moha, Sayog Kevali as being generated of pudgala form
out of karmas.
Comment: One can see samaysara gatha 68 for more
detail.
The different beliefs in context
of gunasthanas:
97. The Mohi (deluded) people believing body and soul to
be one, consider gunasthanas to be Jiva forms. However the wise people proficient
in differentiating knowledge accept the gunasthanas to be pudgala form ajiva.
Worship of guanasthana etc. is
not worship of the sentient muni:
98. The worship of Gurus and great Gurus existent in
Pramatta-Apramatta gunasthanas to Ayogkevali Gunasthanas by means of gunasthana
does not imply the real worship of consciousness form great Munis ( It amounts
to worship of insentient only).
Comment: Such typical worship form has been described
by Acharya Amritchandra in Samaysara kalash 24.
Utility of such worship:
99. However that worship of Pramatta etc.
gunasthanas becomes the nimitta of great
shubhopayoga resulting in accrual of highest punya to the worldly jivas which
is cause for great worldly pleasures.
Comment: shubhopayoga should not be treated as dharma.
Worship of body is not worship of
jiva:
100. Offering prayers to corporeal body does not imply
worship of the Jiva; since description of beauty of scabbard does not describe the sword staying within
the scabbard.
Comment: This is similar to Samaysara gatha 30.
Differentiating knowledge is by
means of characteristics only:
101-102. The thing which appears to be present in another
thing, but it is not clearly apparent
within it, hence it is totally different from the other thing in which it is
apparent; just as taste is different from the color.
Since consciousness is apparent in the body but even then
it is not clearly apparent in the body, hence consciousness is different from
the body; but it is not different from its characteristics of knowledge.
Comment: Even though color and taste are together but
color does not indicate the taste clearly since both are sensed by different
organs. In the same way jiva and body are together and appear to be one but
they are sensed differently by their
different characteristics of knowledge and pudgala.
What all is observed through the
senses is external to soul:
103. Whatever is seen, experienced and known through the
senses ; all that is different from the soul, destructible and insentient.
Forms are pudgala by nature:
104. Whatever is seen, experienced and known through the
senses; all those forms i.e. corporeal-ness is not in the nature of liberated
soul; since forms have been described by the Jinendra Deva as being pudgala
forms and non-conscious.
Bhavas of raga are generated due
to karmas:
105. Just as sun undergoes various stages of obscuration
due to the nimitta of clouds, in the same way the raga, dwesha, pride etc. form
of corruptions i.e. vibhava bhavas of Jiva are all produced due to fruition of
karmas, hence they are described as karma generated.
Comment: From aspect of ashuddha (impure ) Nishchaya
naya, Jiva is responsible for the raga bhava. This is so told as to wean him
away from the raga bhavas. When jiva is ready to make amendment in his life
style then he is directed to treat the raga bhavas as generated due to karmas
so that he could contemplate upon the pure nature of soul.
Jiva remains in Jiva form all the
time:
106. In spite of having eternal relationship of the Jiva
with the karmas, the jiva has never become karma form nor karmas have ever become jiva form. Hence it is clear that jiva has never
manifested into karma form or vice versa.
Comment: Although karmas have resided with jiva, but
they have never transgressed upon each other’s nature.
Objection if soul is called the
karta of dravya karmas:
107. If it is definitely
believed that soul does manifest into karma form by his own Upadan (nature) then how does he enjoy the
fruits of those karmas? Further how do those karmas give fruits to the soul?
Comment: If soul is the doer then how can he also be
enjoyer of the fruits? He cannot be both.
All the bhavas generated due to
fruition/subsidence of karmas are insentient:
108. All those qualities i.e. bhavas, are Audayik due to
being born out of fruition of karmas, are Aupashamik due to being generated
upon subsidence of karmas, are Kshayopashamik due to being generated upon
kshayopasham of karmas; all those bhavas are described as insentient in
different scriptures.
Necessity of knowing Ajiva tatva:
109. Those people, who do not know the difference of Jiva
tatva from Ajiva tatva properly (as described in scriptures), in spite of
following vyavahara charitra as described by Jinendra Deva, they do not attain
pure soul devoid of impurities.
Comment: Unless jiva knows Ajiva tatva correctly as
different from self, even though he may practice conduct severely, still he
cannot attain his pure nature.
3. Asrava Adhikar
Common reason for Asrava:
110. The manifestations of gyan-darshan corrupted by shubha-ashubha
upayoga , resulting in activities of yoga in the form of mind-speech-body, are
cause for pap form asrava (influx) of karmas in general.
Comment: In this Shastra, both the activities of punya
as well as pap are called pap only since they result of influx of karmas and
subsequent bondage which lead to continuity of worldly stay.
Specific reasons for Asrava:
111. Mithyadarshan (wrong belief), asanyam (lack of
restraints), Kashaya (passions), Yoga – these four types of manifestations are
the cause for asrava of pap specifically.
Comment: This is similar to Samaysara gatha 109.
Cause for continuity of
Mithyatva:
112. So long as this Jiva believes the sentient-
insentient other substances as his own i.e. has belief of their ownership etc.,
till then his moha i.e. Mithyatva keeps increasing.
Result of Mithyatva:
113. The belief on oneness with other substances of
sentient- insentient form result in great asrava of karmas for the Jiva.
Therefore the Jiva who is drowned in the
great asrava of karmas cannot attain salvation from the world.
The false beliefs of jiva having
Mithyatva:
114. The karmas generated substances ( dravya karmas of
gyanavarana etc., bhava karmas of moha-raga-dwesha, and body etc. form no
karmas) are within me and I am the cause for those dravya karmas etc.; so long
as the jiva believes in this way, his Mithyatva does not go away.
Beliefs of the Mithyadrishti
which causes Asrava of karmas:
115. I was the owner of the Gyanavarana etc. dravya karmas,
Moha-raga-dwesha form bhav karmas and body etc. form nokarmas in the past, I am
the owner of these substances at present and I shall be the owner in future;
such belief of Mithyadrishti results in asrava of karmas.
Mithyatva is the main cause for
Asrava:
116. So long as this ignorant i.e. Mithyadrishti jiva has
belief of ownership/oneness with any substance of sentient or insentient
nature, till then the asrava of eight types of karmas cannot be prevented.
The doer nature of soul from
different aspects:
117. From aspect of nishchaya naya the soul is karta of
the shubha or ashubha bhava
manifestations of the self and from the aspect of vyavahara naya he is
karta of other dravyas.
Comment: The soul is karta of shubha-ashubha bhavas
from aspect of ashuddha nishchaya naya.
The nimitta- naimittik
relationship between the manifestations of jiva and karmas:
118. Under the influence of the manifestations of the
Jiva, asrava of extremely painful karmas takes place. Further due to fruition
of those extremely painful karmas, Jiva manifests in miserable state.
Nimitta-naimittik relationship is
between paryayas (manifestations) only:
119. Karmas have cause-effect relationship with the
(vibhava ) manifestations of the jiva, however karmas and pure soul do not have
such cause-effect relationship.
Comment: It is highlighted that the relationship is
between momentary paryayas but not between the karma dravya with jiva dravya.
Actually the dravyas remain unchanged all the time.
Objections if karma is doer of
Jiva :
120. If the karmas ( by its own nature) cause
manifestation of the soul then how does karma cause conscious soul to bear the
fruits of its manifestations also and how does the conscious soul enjoy those
fruits ?- both the things are not acceptable.
Comment: This is similar to gatha 107 in this Shastra.
Continued……..
No comments:
Post a Comment