Objections in accepting body etc.
to be that of soul from aspect of nishchaya naya:
211. If from the aspect of Nishchaya naya, the body,
senses, etc. are believed to be belonging to soul then there would be no
difference visible between soul and body but such a difference is directly
observed. Hence the body etc. are not said to be belonging to the soul.
Comment: Thus it establishes the Nishchaya naya to be
true while vyavahara naya is false.
The benefit of knowing self and
others from the two aspects:
212. In this manner, knowing the difference between soul
and the body etc. from the aspects of Vyavahara naya and Nishchaya naya, those
yogis who always accept own dravya to be own while other dravya to be belonging
to others , they carry out Samvar by immersing within their own soul and thus
prevent the influx of karmas.
The form of karma fruition from
aspect of paryaya:
213. From the aspect of paryayarthik naya, some jivas
indulge in shubha-ashubha karmas and some other jivas endure the fruition of
the same.
Comment: For example a jiva did samyam etc. in manushya
paryaya and was born as deva.
The form of karma fruition from
aspect of dravya:
214. From the aspect of Dravyarthik naya, whoever jiva
indulges in shubha-ashubha karmas, the same jiva endures their fruition.
Comment: The jiva born as deva is the same jiva which
was manushya in the example given in gatha above.
Example from aspect of dravya and
paryaya:
215. Just as a human indulges in punya karmas and a deva
enjoys their fruition or soul indulges in punya karmas and soul only enjoys
their fruition.
Form of jiva from aspects of
dravya-paryaya:
216. By accepting Jiva to be permanent- transient in
certain aspect, the statement made above can be justified. By accepting Jiva to
be always permanent or always transitory, nothing can be justified.
Comment: While a permanent jiva cannot have
manifestations itself, a transitory jiva loses his own identity and cannot
enjoy fruits of his own deeds. Both conditions are not acceptable. Hence jiva
should be accepted as permanent-transitory.
Under influence of Audayik
bhavas, jiva is doer-enjoyer of karmas:
217. This conscious jiva, under the influence of Audayik
bhavas i.e. with the nimitta of fruition of karmas, with the assistance of
resulting manifestations indulges in karmas and endures their fruition. In the
absence of Audayik bhavas, he does not indulge in any karmas nor does he endure
their fruition.
Sensory subjects do not do
anything for the jiva:
218. The subjects of touch etc. five senses which are
non-conscious, do not do anything good
or bad for the soul. Soul under delusion with impaired intelligence believes
them to be beneficial or harmful.
Without deluded resolution
dravya, guna or paryaya are not beneficial or harmful:
219. Without deluded imagination, out of all the dravya, guna, paryayas knowable within
this world, none of the dravya, guna or
paryayas are beneficial or harmful.
Comment: Here the resolution/ imagination are to be
taken as Mithyatva due to which ignorant jiva considers a thing to be
beneficial or harmful. To gyani jiva they are indifferent.
Words have no relationship to
Jiva:
220. Words heard in the form of damnation or words heard
in the form of compliments do not do anything good or bad for the jiva, because
words do not have any relationship with the jiva. Ignorant jivas , hearing the
words of condemnation or compliments
unnecessarily indulge in raga-dwesha.
Comment: Words are also pudgala being manifestation of
bhasha vargana hence different from jiva.
Due to Moha only the external
things are considered beneficial or harmful:
221. On account of the blemish of Moha form, all the
external things become nimitta for giving pain or pleasure to the jiva. If the
defect of Moha were not there then any external thing does not become nimitta
at all for giving pain or pleasure to the Jiva. This implies that Moha alone
gives pain or pleasure.
Words don’t make anyone
praiseworthy or disreputable:
222. If observed rightly then from words alone nobody can
become praiseworthy or condemnable. Out of Moha or Mithya Darshan, the ignorant
believe unnecessarily that ‘ I am condemned or I am praised’.
Qualities-defects of other
dravyas do not give happiness-unhappiness to jiva:
223. By the qualities or defects of pudgala etc. other
dravyas, Jiva does not get any happiness or unhappiness; since the qualities or
defects of other dravyas do not enter
into Jiva dravya at all.
Uselessness of other’s
conteplamplation with respect to self:
224. He contemplates to harm me or he plans to benefit me
, such thoughts are useless; because with the thoughts of one person , the
other person cannot be harmed or protected.
Comment: If the desires of one jiva decide the fate of
another jiva then there cannot be any order in the world. Someone may want to
benefit him while another may want to harm him. How can the fate be decided
then?
Uselessness of thoughts:
225. If it is believed that due to thoughts of one Jiva,
the other Jiva is harmed or benefited, then the property or calamities of any
jiva would never reduce.
Comment: Because there would always be people
contemplating of its increase or
decrease.
No dravya is favorable or
unfavorable:
226. On account of Moha, whichever object was considered
to be favorable by the ignorant jiva, with the passage of time same object is
considered to be unfavorable and the thing which was unfavorable becomes
favorable. With this attitude of the ignorant, it becomes clear that in the
world nothing is favorable or unfavorable.
Comment: The decision
of favorableness is taken based upon the raga or dwesha of jiva at given
time.
Jiva himself indulges in right
belief etc. on his own:
227. Just as a conch shell pure by nature, turns white by
its own nature not because of somebody else; in the same way Jiva engages in
the worship of pure jewel trio ( samyak darshan-gyan-charitra) on his own and
not because of someone else.
Comment: Every paryaya of jiva manifests independently
and nobody influences it.
Jiva himself indulges in wrong
belief etc. on his own:
228. Just as conch shell powder, without being dependent
on someone else, turns others white, in the same way soul on its own views the other dravyas, knows
them and believes them.
Comment: The belief with respect to other dravya
represents Mithyatva. Here it implies that Jiva independently engages in false
belief without being influenced by someone else.
The impure manifestation of jiva
is with the nimitta of moha and not his own nature:
229. Just as in conjunction with red flower, the pure
natured sapphire turns red, in the same way, in accompaniment of moha, the pure
natured jiva turns corrupted.
Comment: Thus no one manifests in impure form on his own.
He manifests impurely with the nimitta of moha.
With the destruction of Moha,
Jiva reverts to natural state:
230. Just as with the elimination of conjunction with red
flower, the pure natured sapphire reverts to its original pure nature; in the
same way with the removal of Moha, the Jiva attains his pure nature again.
Comment: The same can be stated as ‘ when jiva by his
own efforts attains natural pure state then moha automatically gets destroyed.’
The one who discards Moha attains
samvar of karmas:
231. In this manner, the yogi who knowing the Moha to be
the seed for suffering, discards Moha; that ascetic attains samvar of karmas by discarding other
dravyas, i.e. prevents influx of karmas.
Comment: Moha is the prime cause for asrava. If Moha is
discarded then bondage is reduced in a
huge way.
Practicing austerity with
raga-dwesha does not give purity:
232. Believing favorable-unfavorable other dravyas to be
cause for pleasure or pain and thus by indulging in raga-dwesha, in spite of
practicing life long austerity, the purity i.e. the real dharma/detachment is
never experienced by that Jiva.
Comment: In spite of severe austerity, if Mithyatva is
present then Jiva can never attain purity although he may accrue shubha karma
bondage.
Jiva accrues karma bondage by
being their doer-enjoyer:
233. This ignorant jiva, indulging in manifestations of
the form of shubha ashubha karmas, enduring the resulting favorable-unfavorable
fruition due to punya pap karmas, accrues the new bondage of the form of gyanarvarana etc.
eight types of karmas which are cause for misery.
Comment: This represents an unbreakable cycle in which
jiva continues manifesting in ignorant form.
Remaining knower-seer is the path
to Moksha:
234. The gyani jiva who believes and accepts the
favorable-unfavorable fruitions of all the punya-pap form karmas to be always
generated out of pudgala; he attains the pure state of his own soul similar to
that of Siddhas devoid of all karmas sequentially.
Gyani is merely knower-seer:
235. The soul which has right knowledge i.e. Samyak
Gyani; he does not accept the other dravyas nor does he discard them. The
ignorant jiva who is corrupted with Mithyatva, he accepts the other dravyas and
leaves them (as his own).
Comment: Gyani knowing the nature of other dravya does
not contemplate its acquisition or rejection while Mithyadrishti indulges in
it.
Sadhus engaged in Samayik etc.
attains Samvar:
236. The Sadhus who practice Samayik, Stava, Vandana,
Pratikraman, Pratyakhyan and Kayotsarga with devotion, they attain Samvar i.e. the
prevent influx of karmas.
Comment: Basically samayik etc. are activities of
shubhopayoga which would result in accrual of punya karmas. However it is
implied here that during these activities the sadhu also indulges in
shuddhopayoga which is the real cause for Samvar. Thus this is a Vyavahara
statement in the gatha.
Form of Samayik:
237. The Muniraj who is immersed in own pure soul
substance and thus practices Veetrag spirit with respect to all jivas etc
dravyas by discarding raga-dwesha with respect to them, he is said to be
engaged in Samayik.
Comment: This establishes the Nishchaya form of Samayik
.
Form of Stava:
238. The Muniraj who is immersed in his own pure soul
substance and always worships the pure conscious form dravya which has specific
conscious nature, devoid of impurity of karmas and having nature of the three jewels ; such prayer has been declared
as Stava by wise ones.
Comment: Thus Stava also can be said to be in Vyavahara
and Nishchaya forms.
Form of Vandana:
239. When Muniraj offers obeisance to the pure soul which
has attained samyak darshan, samyak gyan , samyak charitra; then that pious act
of offering obeisance and the pure manifestation in the form of obeisance is
called Vandana.
Comment: Thus Vandana also has a Shubhopayoga state
which leads to shuddhopayoga and vice versa. However it may be noted that only
Shubhopayoga without shuddhopayoga is
meaningless.
Form of Pratikraman:
240. The bhavas of punya and pap generated out of fruition
of dravya karmas performed in the past – Disassociating the ownership of those
dravya and bhava karmas from self totally is called Pratikraman.
Continued……
So nice explanation.m deeply interested.
ReplyDeleteHappy to note the same.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete