Description of Syadvad
46. Jiva has
several paryayas hence there are several within one; the several paryayas
belong to one Jiva dravya only hence within several there is one; thus it is
one or several cannot be said at all. It is not one and nor is it several; in
certain aspect it is one and in certain aspect it is several. From aspect of
Vyavahara naya he is karta, from aspect of Nishchaya naya he is non-karta. From
aspect of Vyavahara naya he is enjoyer of karmas and from aspect of Nishchaya
naya he is non-enjoyer of karmas. From aspect of Vyavahara naya he is born and
from aspect of Nishchaya naya he does not take birth- was there, is there and
will be there. From aspect of Vyavahara naya he dies, from aspect of Nishchaya
naya he is immortal. From aspect of Vyavahara naya he speaks and thinks, while
from aspect of Nishchaya naya he neither speaks nor thinks. From aspect of
Nishchaya naya he does not have any shape while from aspect of Vyavahara naya
he has several forms. Such consciousness form Param Ishwara is turning
topsy-turvy in conjunction with karmas as if an artist is playing games.
Nirvikalpa upayoga alone is worthy of
experience
47. The
savikalpa state of jiva in the topsy turvy form like that of an artist is not
worthy of experiencing. Only his Nirvikalpa state is worthy of experiencing.
Allegory of relinquishing vikalpas
while experiencing
48. Just as
some clever person made a necklace of pearls and in making the necklace he
carried out ingenuity in several ways, but the one wearing the necklace does
not pay attention to its ingenuity, he enjoys the grandeur of pearls only. In the same way
although Jiva is neither doer nor enjoyer, the one who is doer he alone is
enjoyer, someone else is doer and someone else is enjoyer, there are just nayas
which are acceptable, even so during experience all these webs of vikalpas are
worthy of renunciation, only nirvikalpa experience is the real taste of nectar.
From which aspect soul is doer of
karmas and not so from which aspect
49. Soul is
the karta of dravya karma , this is told by Vyavahara naya, but from aspect of
Nishchaya naya the nature of a thing is in accordance with nature of dravya –
in other words the insentient dravya is karta of insentient while consciousness
is karta of sentient bhavas.
Gyan manifests in the shape of the
Gyeya but it does not become gyeya form
50.
Although the nature of gyan is
manifestation in the shape of object of knowledge, even so the gyan remains
within gyan only and object of knowledge remains within object of knowledge.
Such regulation has been in practice since eternal times, no one infringes upon
others nature, i.e. gyan does not transform into object of knowledge and object
of knowledge does not become gyan. Even so some Mithya Drishti – Vaisheshik
etc. say that gyan is getting corrupted by manifesting in the form of object of
knowledge, hence perturbed due to such foolishness they keep wandering- without
understanding the nature of thing they are lost in delusions.
Meaning: It is one sided view of Vaisheshiks that all the objects of world are
reflected in the knowledge, due to which the knowledge becomes impure, hence so
long as the impurity prevails, he would not attain salvation. But this is not
so, knowledge is like a clean mirror, upon which the image of objects is
imposed hence it is said from aspect of
Vyavahara naya that due to reflection of object of certain colour the mirror is
seen to be of that colour but in reality with the image the mirror did not
undergo any change and it remained as it is.
The substances of the world are
mutually non pervasive
51. From
aspect of Nishchaya naya, all the objects are independent , no one has any
expectations from another, nor does one substance join with another. The soul
form Jiva knows all the objects of the world but all of them remain distinct
from him.
Meaning: From aspect of Vyavahara naya, the dravyas of the world join with one
another, merge into one another and give space to one another. But from aspect
of Nishchaya naya, all are self dependent, no one joins with another. In the
complete knowledge of jiva, all of them and in his incomplete knowledge, all
the objects to the possible extent are reflected, but gyan does not merge with
them nor do those objects merge with gyan.
Engaging in karmas and enjoying its
fruition is not own nature of Jiva
52. Agyani jivas
engage in carrying out karmas and enjoy their fruition, this statement is from
aspect of Vyavahara naya and not of the nature of the substance.
Distinctiveness of Gyan and Gyeya
53. The
manifestation of Gyan is in accordance with the form of subject of knowledge,
but the gyan does not become same as subject of knowledge. All six dravyas are
objects of knowledge and they are different from the gyan which is own nature
of soul. The one who knows the difference between knower and the object of
knowledge by means of their qualities-characteristics, he is Samyak Drishti
with differentiating knowledge. Agyanis of the form of Vaisheshik etc. observe
the vikalpa of form in the gyan and say that the shape of object of knowledge
is existent within the gyan. This directly implies gyan to be impure and people
do not realise it.
Meaning: Jiva substance is knower by nature and gyan is his quality. He knows all
the six dravyas of the world by means of his quality of gyan, as well as he
knows self also. Therefore all the Jiva-Ajiva substances of the world and the
own soul are objects of knowledge while soul having the nature of knowing self
and others is knower. The essence is that soul is object of knowledge as well
as knower and other than soul, all other substances are objects of knowledge.
Hence when some object of knowledge is reflected in the gyan, then gyan
manifests in the form of object of knowledge, but gyan remains as gyan and does
not become same as object of knowledge. The object of knowledge remains as
object of knowledge and does not become same as gyan, nor does one mix with another.
The dravya, kshetra, kaal and bhava
foursome of object of knowledge remains different and the dravya, kshetra, kaal
and bhava foursome of knower remains different. Even then those without
rational knowledge, Vaisheshik etc. upon observing the form of object of
knowledge in the gyan declare the gyan to be impure. They say that -
The logic of the agyanis in the
context of gyan and gyeya
54. The agyanis believe that the one which is
Nirakar ( without form), such Bramha/soul cannot be Sakar( with form). Hence so long as
Gyan is of the form of Gyeya ( object of knowledge), till then it cannot be
complete Bramha. ( Hence they believe it to be a blemish)
The address to agyanis in this
context
55.
Vaisheshik & others believe the manifestation of Bramha in the form of object of knowledge to be a blemish and attempt to eradicate it.
But by what so ever efforts the nature of substance cannot be eliminated, hence
those fools unnecessarily take trouble.
Further
56. The
Agyani people do not know the reality of substance and accept single sided
view. The Syadvadi is knowledgeable of all the aspects of the substance and
believe all the dharmas of the substance to be real.
Meaning: Syadvad accepts both manifestations of gyan in the form of Nirakar (without form) as well as Sakar( with form). It is Sakar
since the gyan manifests in the form of gyeya (object of knowledge). It is
Nirakar since gyan does not undergo any corruption caused by Gyeya.
Laudation of Syadvadi Samyak Drishti
57. The
Samyak Drishti Jivas experience dravya to be pure and by knowing the pure substance they have
purity in heart, therefore they do not eliminate the inbred nature. The message
is that transforming into the form of object of knowledge is instinctive nature
of gyan hence the Samyak Drishti Jivas do not eliminate the nature of Jiva.
Metaphor on the gyan not being
pervaded by Gyeya
58. Just as
rays of moon illuminate the earth as white but does not become of the form of
earth- it remains illumination form, in the same way the capability of gyan is
to illuminate the gyeya (object of knowledge) substances of
discardable-desirable forms, but does not become of the form of gyeya. The pure
substance manifests in the form of shuddha paryaya and remains within own
existential dimensions, under no conditions it changes into the form of other.
This is sure and the eternal Jina Vani is declaring it.
Real nature of soul substance
59. So long
as jiva is afflicted with the fruition of Mithya Gyan, till then he manifests
in raga-dwesha form. However when the gyan has awakened, then he understands
the karma manifestations to be different from self. When by separating karma
manifestations and soul manifestations he experiences the soul then Mithya
Mohaniya does not get a place. With the complete destruction of Moha the Keval
Gyan and infinite bliss are revealed which leads to attainment of Siddha state.
Subsequently he does not have to return in the world of birth & death form.
Means for attainment of Paramatma
state
60. The Jiva
form soul has relationship with karmas since eternal times hence he
effortlessly attains Mithyatva bhava and
due to manifestations in raga-dwesha form he does not realise own and other’s
nature. But with the destruction of darkness of Mithyatva and the arising of
Samyaktva form moon, the raga-dwesha do not have any existence – shortly they
are destroyed. With the practice of experiencing the soul he immerses in the
bliss and sequentially he becomes complete Paramatma. Observing the Nishchaya form
of such complete Paramatma Pandit Banarasi dasji offers salutations at their
feet.
The cause for raga-dwesha are
Mithyatva
61. The
disciple enquires that O Swami, what is the cause for manifestations in the
form of raga-dwesha? Is it Pudgala karmas? Are they enjoyments of the senses?
Or is it wealth? Or is it family? Or is it home? So please tell. Upon this Shri
Guru explains that all the six dravyas manifest within their own nature
dependent upon self, no dravya functions as motivator for manifestation of
other dravya, hence the root cause for raga-dwesha is intoxication with Moha
Mithyatva form liquor.
The reason for raga-dwesha as per the
agyanis
62-63. Some
fools say that raga-dwesha bhavas transpire in the soul on account of
coercion by pudgala. They say that under
fruition of pudgala karma, the way it coerces, accordingly the raga-dwesha
manifestations transpire.
Preachment of the true path to
Agyanis
64-66. Shri
Guru says that those who adopt such adverse obstinacy in belief, they can never
be rid of raga-dwesha-moha. (65). If Jiva has relationship with pudgala at all
times in the world then he does not have an opportunity for attaining shuddha
bhavas- i.e. he can never attain purity. (66). Only consciousness form king is
capable of generating bhavas of the consciousness form, therefore in Mithyatva
state raga-dwesha bhavas are generated while in Samyaktva state Shiva bhavas
i.e. gyan-darshan -bliss etc. are generated.
Glory of Gyan
67-70. Just
as in the night the lamp provides illumination in all directions and
illuminates the pot, cloth etc. substances but does not become pot, cloth form.
(68). In the same way the gyan knows all the gyeya (objects of knowledge) and
manifests in the shape of the objects of knowledge even then it does not
relinquish its own nature. (69). The knowing nature of gyan remains always
eternal , it does not undergo any corruption of any kind and nor does he become
raga-dwesha-moha form forgetting own self. From aspect of nishchaya naya the glory of
gyan is such in the soul but the agyani
Mithya Drishti jivas do not even look towards the nature of soul at all.
Agyani jivas remain immersed in other
substances only
71. The
Agyani Jivas remain engrossed in other dravyas, indulge in raga-dwesha and desire
possessions, but do not search for the
nature of soul.
Kumati is generated in Agyanis while
Sumati is generated in Gyanis
72-73. In
the heart of fool Kumati (wrong intellect) is generated while in the heart of
Gyanis the Sumati (right intellect) illuminates. The bad intelligence is like Kubja (name of a
servant) who bonds with new karmas while good intelligence is like Radhika who
makes one to immerse in soul substance. (73).The bad intelligence is like
black hunchback Kubja who causes anguish
in the world while good intelligence is like Radhika who makes one to worship
the own soul and knows the difference of self and others.
Similarity of Kumati and Kubja
74. Kumati
is produced while fruition of deception is in existence hence it is deceptive
and Kubja was engaged in deception who was controlling other’s husband. Kumati
appears unpleasant to the world hence it is ugly, Kubja was dark without sheen hence was ugly. Kumati
takes possession of other dravyas, Kubja used to have relationship with other’s
husband hence both are adulterers. Kumati becomes subordinate to sensory
subjects due to its impurity hence is sold to them while Kubja was under the
influence of others hence appeared to be
sold to them. Both Kumati and Kubja do not notice their good or bad,
therefore their state is like that of a blind person. Kumati is capable of
having spirit of oneness with other substances while Kubja also was capable to
controlling Krishna hence both are powerful like Kabandh (name of a demon).
Both cause enhancement of karma bondage. The tendency of both is to create
havoc. Kumati does not take a look at her husband soul while Kubja also does
not take a look at her husband, therefore their activities are like that of a
prostitute. Both are intoxicated like a drunkard. Kumati does not have any
restriction of rules of dharma etc. and Kubja also does not follow her husbands
dictates. Therefore both are independent like a bull. Both are shameless like
the pedigree of jester. Kumati does not know the mystery of own soul space form
home while Kubja also being engaged in depravity did not notice the state of
her home. Kumati is subordinate to karma while Kubja was subordinate to other’s
husband, therefore both are suffering the subordination. In this manner the
Kumati has been compared with a slave
called Kubja.
Comparison of Sumati with Radhika
75. Sumati
is immersed in own nature of soul and Radhika is also beautiful. Kumati is key
to opening the lock of ignorance, Radhika also provides wealth of providence.
Sumati and Radhika both have taken bath in the ocean of morality and both are
peaceful natured pleasant. Both are like east direction in which the knowledge
form sun arises. Sumati is devoid of desires for future enjoyments of senses
and Radhika also does not demand future enjoyments. Sumati is very well engaged
in own soul nature and Radhika also is drenched in the affection towards
husband. The glory of the status of sumati and Radhika is beyond words i.e.
great. Sumati has real ownership of the soul and Radhika is also master of the
house. Sumati takes care of own home i.e. soul while Radhika also keeps a watch
of her home. Sumati immerses within own soul while Radhika engages with her
husband Krishna. The glory of Sumati has been described in spiritual scriptures
and glory of Radhika has been described in the scriptures pertaining to beauty
and art forms. Sumati is venerable to saints while Radhika is respected by
Gyanis. Sumati and Radhika both are serious without perturbations. Sumati is
rich with grandeur and Radhika is also illustrious. In this manner Sumati has
been compared with Radhika rani.
Activities of Kumati and Sumati
76. Kumati
is Kubja and Sumati is Radhika. Kumati would cause transmigration in the world
and Sumati is rational. Kumati would result in karma bondage and Sumati is
having great sense of differentiation of self and others.
Forms of Dravya Karma, Bhava karma
and rationality
77.
Gyanavaraniya etc. dravya karma are paryayas of pudgala. Raga-dwesha etc. bhava
karmas are vibhava of soul. Manifestations with sense of differentiation
between self and others is a great treasure
of knowledge.
78. Just as
a person playing Chopad (game similar to Ludo) with great enthusiasm of winning
in the mind and with considerable care of intellect plays the pieces but the
result is dependent upon the dice. In the same way the jivas of the world for
their attainment of objective, plan about the possible efforts, but the result
occurs depending upon fruition of karmas. This is the way of karma
manifestations. The karmas which have reached Udayavali ( nearing fruition)
cannot be prevented from giving result.
Metaphor of chess in the context of
rational gyani
79. Just as
a player of chess understands all the strategies of playing chess and keeping
eye on both sides he plays his moves. Keeping the movements of elephant, horse,
queen, pawn etc. in mind he plans his victory, in the same way the gyani person
expert in Moksha Marga examines the nature of self and avoids hindrances. He
purifies the qualities of soul and contemplates upon the victory i.e. state of
fearlessness. This is the state of manifestation of gyan.
Acts of Kumati Kubja and Sumati Radhika
80-81.
Radhika i.e. Sumati plays chess due to which she always wins and Kumati plays
Chopad wherein she always loses. The heart in which Kubja i.e. kumati is
residing, that jiva is agyani and the heart in which Radhika i.e. Sumati is
residing, that gyani is samyak Drishti.
Meaning : Agyani jivas follow the path of karmas and therefore lose i.e. wander in
the world and Pandit people move sensibly hence attain victory i.e. salvation.
Where shuddha gyan is present, the
Charitra is also present
82. Where
illumination of the phase of pure gyan is seen, there part of Charitra is
present accordingly. Therefore Gyani jivas understand both discardable and
venerable. They mostly manifest in detached bhava form and remain different
from raga-dwesha-moha. Due to this their earlier bonded karmas are shed and
karma bondage in present and future does not accrue. They remain steady in the
spirit of contemplation of pure soul. Thus they are real complete Paramatma
only.
Further
83. Where
gyan bhava is present their pure charitra is present therefore gyan and
detachment together practice for Moksha.
Metaphor of Lame and blind in the
context of Gyan and Charitra
84-85. Just
as some lame person climbs upon the shoulders of a blind person , then with
assistance of eyes of the lame and legs of blind both can move. (85). In the
same way where Gyan and Charitra both have unity, there Moksha Marg is present.
The Gyan knows the nature of soul and Charitra remains stationary within soul.
Manifestations of Gyan and Kriya
86-87. Gyan
is jiva’s carefulness, and Shubha-ashubha form manifestations make him forget.
Gyan is producer of Moksha while karma is means for birth-death form world.
(87). With fruition of Gyan Chetna the pure paramatma is revealed and with
Shubha-ashubha form manifestations the bhavas causing bondage are generated.
The different effects of karma and
Gyan
88-89. So
long as Gyan Chetna is different from self i.e. fruition of gyan chetna has not
happened, till then Jiva remains miserable and worldly. When the Gyan chetna
has awakened in the heart then automatically the gyani gets detached. (89). He
knows his own nature to be of the same form as that of Siddha, and the believes
the bhavas generated with the nimitta of others to be of the form of others. He
practices the experience of pure soul and does not accept the bhava karma, dravya
karma and no karma to be his own.
Continued….
No comments:
Post a Comment