10. Sarva Vishuddha Gyan
Adhikar
Shloka 193: Mass of knowledge form soul reveals itself.
How does it reveal itself? – After destroying all the bhavas of
doer and enjoyer totally, it reveals itself.
And how is it? – Due to the nimitta of kshayopasham of karmas,
different states are generated. It is distant from all those thoughts of bandh
and Moksha. It is pure, pure. – By repeating pure twice it implies that it is
devoid of ragas etc. impurities and the obscuration thereof.
And how is it? – Whose pure, stationary, magnificence is filled
with the spread of knowledge and consciousness form own flavour.
And how is it? Whose glory is firm like stone carving.
Kalash 1/193: Now this existent shuddha jiva dravya gets revealed.
Bhavartha is
as follows- Here onwards the pure nature of jiva is described. How is the mass
of knowledge? Its nature can be realised by experience having same form at all
times, it is such. And how is it? It is like
unobscured flame form having perturbation free illumination with
completely pure gyan chetna. And how is it? It is pure pure- by repeating twice
it emphasizes the purity.
And how is
it? With the destruction of collocated gyanavarana etc. karma mass and the
revelation of the nature of jiva – such two vikalpas which occur in each
paryaya of ekendriya to panchendriya, it is completely different.
Bhavartha is as follows- From ekendriya to
panchendriya, the jiva dravya is free of
the vikalpas of bandh or moksha from aspect of dravya nature. The nature of
dravya is just as it is. How does the jiva dravya attain it? With the
destruction from roots of the infinite vikalpas of the form that ‘jiva is
karta’ and ‘jiva is enjoyer’, thus having infinite divisions .
Shloka
194: Just as this consciousness form soul does not have nature of
enjoyership, in the same way it does not have nature of doership. Hence those
who believe the soul to be doer, do so out of ignorance. But once ignorance is
removed then soul is non-doer only.
Kalash 2/194: It is not in the nature of jiva having consciousness nature to carry out
gyanavarana etc. karmas or manifestations in the form of ragas etc. Just as
jiva is not enjoyer of karmas either.
Bhavartha is as follows- If Jiva dravya were
the enjoyer of karma then he would be karta also ; but he is not enjoyer hence
he is not karta either. Due to what reason this jiva carries out ragas etc.
form impure manifestations? Due to Mithyatva form vibhava manifestations having
oneness with the karma generated bhavas; this jiva is karta due to this.
Bhavartha is
as follows- It is not the natural
quality of the jiva to be karta of ragas
etc. vibhava manifestations but he has impure form manifestations. With the
destruction of vibhava manifestations of the form of Mithyatva, raga dwesha
form, the jiva becomes totally non karta.
Shloka 195: In this
way the jiva, having his own pure flavour, is established to be non karta of other
dravyas and other bhavas.
How is that jiva ? – whose nature is to remain within his own
consciousness form flame spreading & revealing the entire universe. In
spite of this, Jiva has clear bondage with the karma particles in this world-
this is definite ignorance of extreme nature which is very deep and cannot be described.
Kalash 3/195: The existent consciousness form dravya
is not karta of gyanavarana etc. or ragas etc. impure manifestations.
This is so eternally by nature. How is it? From aspect of dravya, it is
different from dravya karma, bhava karma and no karma. Infinite dravyas are
reflected along with their past, present and future all the paryayas by means
of consciousness quality having illumination form, it is such. Even though the
jiva dravya is pure, even then
definitely in worldly state whatever gyanavarana etc. karma form bondage is
accrued , that is on account of Mithyatva form vibhava manifestation capability
having such nature. How is it? It is incomprehensible. Bhavartha is as follows-
The Jiva dravya in worldly state has manifested in vibhava form Mithyatva, raga
dwesha moha forms , for this reason he is karta of the manifested bhavas in
ashuddha form. On elimination of impure bhavas the jiva is non karta by nature.
Shloka 196: Just as being karta is not nature of the soul, in
the same way being Bhokta (enjoying fruition) is also not nature of the soul.
The jiva manifests as bhokta out of ignorance and when ignorance is removed
then he manifests without experiencing being bhokta.
Kalash 4/196: The consciousness form jiva dravya is not enjoyer of fruition of
gyanavarana etc. karmas or happiness-unhappiness form karma phal chetna or
ragas etc. impure manifestation form karma chetna – such is not the natural
quality of jiva as has been described by Ganadhar Deva. He has told that jiva
does not have nature of being enjoyer.
An allegory
is narrated- Just as jiva dravya is not karta of karma, even then this jiva
enjoys his happiness-unhappiness form manifestations – due to what reasons?
Since eternal times there is conjunction
of karmas hence he manifests in Mithyatva raga dwesha impure vibhava
form manifestations, therefore he is enjoyer. Upon destruction of mithyatva
form vibhava manifestations the jiva dravya is completely non enjoyer.
Bhavartha is
as follows- Just as jiva dravya has infinite foursome nature, in the same way
he does not have nature of being doer-enjoyer of karmas. On account of
afflictions of karmas, impure manifestation form vibhava form corruption is
there which is destructible. Upon destruction of that vibhava manifestation the
jiva is non karta and non enjoyer.
Further, now
it is told that Mithya Drishti jiva is karta of dravya karma and bhava karma
while Samyak Drishti is not.
Shloka
197: Agyani people are attached to the nature of karmas, immersed in them.
They believe them to be their own nature, hence they experience them all the
time, enjoy them. On the other hand gyani are detached towards the nature of
karmas, unattracted to them and know
them as of the nature of others hence they do not experience them in the least
or enjoy them.
Kalash 5/197: Such Mithyatva form manifestation of the form of oneness in other
dravyas, of samyak Drishti jivas is worthy of being totally destructible
whichever way possible.
How are the
Samyak Drishti jiva? They are engrossed in experience of shuddha consciousness
in continuous stream form. How is the experience of pure consciousness? It is
of the nature of jiva dravya completely free from all afflictions.
What should
be done ? It is venerable to remain experiencing the pure substance form
samykatva form manifestation at all times . How should he do? By realising the
nature of manifestation of substance. How is that nature? The Mithya Drishti
jiva at all times is enjoyer of dravya karma and bhava karma since such is the manifestation
of Mithyatva.
How is the
agyani? Upon fruition of gyanavarana etc. eight karmas he manifests with spirit
of oneness in four gati form bodies, ragas etc. bhavas, happiness-unhappiness
form manifestations. Upon destruction of Mithyatva, the samyak Drishti jiva is absolutely not
enjoyer of dravya karma, bhava karma; such is nature of substance.
How is the
gyani? He has renounced the ownership of the activities caused by fruition of
karmas. Bhavartha is as follows- Upon attainment of Samyaktva the impurity of
jiva is eliminated hence he is not enjoyer.
Shloka 198: Gyani does not indulge in karmas independently,
nor does he experience it. He only knows the nature of karmas. In this manner,
just knowing only, he is stationary within his own pure nature without
experiencing or enjoying it. Hence in reality the Gyani is liberated only, i.e.
he is called free from the karmas.
Kalash 6/198: The Samyak Drishti jiva is not karta of ragas etc. form impure
manifestations. Nor is he enjoyer of happiness unhappiness form impure
manifestations.
How is the Samyak Drishti jiva? Definitely
these body, enjoyments, ragas etc., happiness, unhappiness etc. all are
fruition of karmas and not of the nature of jiva- the Samyak Drishti jiva knows
thus, but he does not manifest in ownership form. For this reason the Samyak
Drishti jiva is like uncorrupted Siddhas.
How is the Samyak Drishti jiva ? Whatever is
the mass of other dravyas, he is just knower of them but not owner of them like
Mithya Drishti. And how is he? He is engrossed in enjoying the pure consciousness form substance. Why? The
bhavas of carrying out karmas, enjoyments of karmas have all been eliminated
for the Samyak Drishti- for this reason.
Bhavartha is
as follows- Mithyatva is the world and with elimination of Mithyatva the jiva
is like Siddha.
Shloka 199: Those people who are under the obscuration of
darkness of ignorance and believe only soul to be karta, they wish to attain
Moksha but they cannot attain Moksha just like ordinary worldly folks.
Kalash 7/199: Such Mithya Drishti jivas cannot destroy karmas and attain pure nature.
How are those jivas? They are follower of Jain principles, well read, practice
physical activities form charitra, desirous of Moksha, even then they cannot
get Moksha. Like whom? Just as other faith followers Tapas, yogi etc. do not attain
Moksha.
Bhavartha is as follows- Someone may think
that since he is follower of jain faith hence there would be something
different but such difference is not there. How are those jivas? Those Mithya
Drishti jivas believe, think and experience that jiva dravya carries out
gyanavarana etc. karmas and impure ragas etc. impure manifestations since that
is jiva dravya’s nature. And how are they? They are surrounded by darkness of
Mithyatva bhava and have been blinded.
Bhavartha is as follows- they are highly
Mithya Drishti who believe the nature of jivas to be as karta form. The reason
is that being karta is not nature of jiva. It is vibhava form impure
manifestation; which too is in conjunction with others, and is destructible.
Shloka 200: When other dravyas and soul substances do not
have any relationship then in the absence of their karta-karma relationship,
how can there be the doership of the other dravyas?
Kalash 8/200: For this reason how can there be relationship between gyanavarana etc.
karma form pudgala mass and pure jiva dravya with jiva dravya being karta of
pudgala karma and pudgala dravya being karta of jiva bhava? It does not exist.
Which
reason? Jiva being karta and gyanavarana etc. as karma, such relationship between two dravyas
are not in the nature of dravya. That too due to which reason? Although some
other substance is occupying the same space, even then they are within their
own nature and one dravya does not get merged with another dravya. Such is the
nature of substance. For this reason jiva is not the karta of pudgala karma.
Shloka 201: Since in this world, one substance having
any relationship with another substance
has been rejected, hence where there are different substances, there is no
relationship of karta-karma. Hence worldly people as well as Munis also, should
observe the real nature of substance in this way only that no one is karta of
another. One should believe that one dravya is not karta of another dravya.
Kalash 9/201: For this reason the Jiva dravya sentient form, pudgala dravya insentient
form- experiencing such difference the jiva dravya karta and pudgala mass
karma- such vyavahara is absolutely untrue.
Then how is
it? Those who are Samyak Drishti jivas, they should experience and taste that
the nature of jiva is not karta. Why? The reason is that the shuddha jiva
dravya and pudgala dravya do not have oneness from aspects of dravya, guna
(quality), and paryaya in past-present-future periods.
Bhavartha is as follows- Since eternal times
the dravya is the same as it was, it does not mix with other dravyas, hence
jiva dravya is not karta of pudgala karma.
Shloka 202: Those people who do not know the abovementioned
principle of the nature of substances are addressed by Acharya filled with
remorse ‘ oh! Those whose mighty capability for effort has been drowned in
ignorance, they indulge in karma like paupers’. In this way the karta for bhava
karma is conscious self only and none else.
Kalash 10/202: It is sad that the mass of Mithya Drishti jivas engage in moha, raga,
dwesha form impure manifestations. Their shuddha illumination of consciousness
has been obscured by the Mithyatva form bhava, since they directly do not
experience the nature of substance that the jiva dravya is not karta of
gyanavarana etc. pudgala mass.
Bhavartha is
as follows- The Mithya Drishti mass of jivas is corrupted from experience of
shuddha nature, hence they are engaged in paryayas and therefore they manifest
in Mithyatva, raga, dwesha form impure manifestations. For this reason the jiva dravya himself
becomes karta of Mithyatva, raga, dwesha form impure consciousness form
manifestations in pervasive-pervaded form, and pudgala karma is not karta.
Bhavartha is
as follows- The impure bhava form manifestations which are being
manifested by Jiva being Mithya Drishti.
he only is the karta of those bhavas, such is the Siddhant.
Shloka 203: Bhava karma is an act and it cannot be
accomplished without doing. This karma cannot be carried out by jiva and
prakriti both since the Prakriti is corporeal and non conscious and it gives
rise to the scenario of it enjoying fruition of its karmas. It cannot be act of
Prakriti alone since Prakriti is corporeal and bhava karma are conscious; hence
jiva alone is karta of this bhava
karma. These are deeds of jiva alone since they have oneness with conscious
self and manifestations of conscious self. Pudgala does not know hence bhava
karma does not belong to pudgala.
Kalash 11/203: For this reason the Jiva dravya manifests in pervasive-pervaded form in
those ragas etc. form impure consciousness manifestations in that period, hence
he is karta. The ragas etc. form impure manifestations are impure form,
sentient form hence in that period the jiva dravya manifests in
pervasive-pervaded manner on his own hence they are carried out by jiva.
Why ? The reason is that the pudgala dravya is
not conscious form while ragas etc. form manifestations are conscious form
therefore they are carried out by jiva. This point is strengthened further as
follows- It is not so that the ragas etc.
impure conscious form
manifestations are axiomatic like eternal akash dravya but they
are carried surely out by someone.
How so? The
reason is they are generated like pot and get destroyed. Further the ragas etc.
impure conscious manifestations are not the activity of conscious dravya and
pudgala dravya together.
Bhavartha is
as follows- Someone may believe that in conjunction of jiva with karmas, the
ragas etc. form impure manifestations
occur hence both the dravyas are karta. The answer is that both dravyas are not
karta, since the external reason ( nimitta cause) for ragas etc, impure
manifestations is fruition of pudgala karma; the internal cause is jiva dravya
manifesting in vibhava form in pervasive-pervaded manner, therefore the
karta-ness of jiva gets established but not that of pudgala karma. The reason
is that the gyanavarana etc. dravya karmas which are insentient dravya form,
get to be enjoyer of happiness-unhappiness for their deeds.
Bhavartha is as follows- The bhava in which
the dravya engages as karta, he gets to be enjoyer of the same also. Now if the
ragas etc. impure conscious manifestations are carried out by jiva and karma
together jointly then both shall be enjoyer also, but both are not enjoyers.
The reason is that Jiva dravya is sentient and for him the enjoyment of
happiness-unhappiness is feasible but for
pudgala dravya being insentient the enjoyment of happiness-unhappiness
is not feasible. Therefore worldly jiva only is karta and enjoyer of the ragas
etc. form impure conscious manifestations. The same is strengthened further- These are not deeds
of pudgala karma alone.
Bhavartha is as follows- someone may believe
that ragas etc. impure conscious manifestations are carried out by pudgala
karma alone. The answer is that this too
is not possible since it is experienced that pudgala karma is insentient
and ragas etc. impure manifestations are impure consciousness form. The
manifestations of insentient dravya would be insentience form and not sentience
form. Therefore the worldly jiva only is karta and enjoyer of ragas etc. impure
manifestations.
Shloka 204: Several Jivas have harmed the soul being totally
singular minded. They have thought only karma to be karta and discarding the
possibility of soul being karta, they have opposed the words of Jineshwar
Deva which are absolutely correct that
‘this soul is karta in certain aspect’.
How are those absolutely singular minded? – Whose intelligence
is clouded by fruition of extreme Moha or Mithyatva ; hence for their benefit,
for cleansing of their knowledge in samyak way, the limitations of the
substance are described.
How do they describe? – By the power i.e. the principle of
Syadvad who have attained victory i.e. unopposed glory.
Kalash 12/204: The extent of nature of jiva dravya is narrated, the way it is. How is
it? Jiva is karta and non-karta also- such Anekant nature which has been carefully established by which he has emerged
victorious.
Why it is told? Those who call jiva as
completely non-karta, to correct the opposite concept of Mithya Drishti jivas,
for this nimitta the nature of jiva is established. How is that mass of Mithya
Drishti jivas? Whose Samyaktva capability of experiencing the pure nature
is obscured by strong fruition of
Mithyatva bhava, it is such.
And how is it? Several Mithya Drishti jivas
get very angry upon listening alone that consciousness natured jiva dravya is
karta of impure bhavas by force of some logic. How angry they become? Which is
very strong and inflexible. Why they be so ? Not accepting jiva to be karta of
his own ragas etc. impure bhavas, they get angry .
What do they
believe? Only gyanavarana etc. karma mass is karta of ragas etc. impure
manifestations in pervasive-pervaded manner on its own. Thus they strongly
believe. How are they? They are destructive of their own self since they are Mithya Drishti.
Shloka 205: Those
Jainas, followers of Arihanta, they
should not accept soul as non karta like the Samkhya followers. They should
believe the soul to be karta prior to realization of differentiating knowledge
and after attainment of differentiating knowledge they should view it as
stationary knower directly, devoid of being karta truly.
Kalash 13/205: It was told that the nature of jiva would be narrated by means of
Syadvad nature. It is elaborated- Those Samyak Drishti jivas who accept jain
concept of Syadvad nature, they should not accept that jiva dravya is
absolutely non karta of ragas etc. impure manifestations.
Like whom?
Just as Samkhya followers believe Jivas to be absolutely non karta , in the
same way the Jains should not accept Jivas
to be absolutely non karta. What is acceptable is described- The Jiva dravya
being corrupted from pure manifestation
form Samyaktva, being Mithya Drishti, manifests in moha, raga, dwesha
form manifestations; for that long jiva is surely karta of moha, raga, dwesha form impure conscious manifestations-
this surely believe.
When the
same jiva manifests in own pure natured samyaktva bhava form relinquishing the
Mithyatva manifestations, then believe that he has abandoned being karta of
ragas etc. ashuddha bhavas- experience thus.
Bhavartha is as follows- Just as jiva has
nature of knowledge quality and that knowledge quality is not abandoned in
worldly or Moksha state either; in the same way ragas etc. are not nature of
jiva therefore in worldly state, so long as conjunction with karmas is there,
till then jiva manifests in moha, raga, dwesha form impure vibhava
manifestations and till then he is karta.
Subsequent
to manifestation of Samyaktva quality of jiva, know this- The power of
knowledge is such that it is keen to know all the subjects of knowledge. And
how is it? It has appeared on its own to self. And how is it? Free of
transmigration in four gatis. And how is it? Of the form of knowledge alone.
And how is it? It is pure substance form free of ragas etc. impure
manifestations.
Shloka 206: Buddhist, followers of transientism, imagine the
soul substance as transient therefore believe the karta and bhokta to be
different. They believe that karta is someone else and bhokta is someone
different. This ignorance is removed by the wonderful consciousness only by
himself.
How does it do it? – By irrigating with the nectar of permanency
it removes it.
Kalash 14/206: Some Bauddha follower jiva differentiates between the doer and enjoyer
in his knowledge.
Bhavartha is as follows- He says that the doer
of deed is someone else and enjoyer of the result is someone else. Why does he
believe so? The Jiva dravya who is eternally consciousness form , he believes
it to be transitory. Just as someone views the white conche shell to be yellow
due to disease in the eye, in the same way on account of false delusion he
believes that the eternal jiva dravya destroys within one samaya itself and a
new jiva takes birth.
Therefore he
believes that the doer of the deed is some other jiva and the enjoyer of the
result is some other jiva. Such belief is the root of Mithyatva. Therefore such
jiva is explained- Some jiva saw some town in childhood and after sometime
becoming adult he comes and sees the same town and upon seeing such a knowledge
is generated that this is the same town which I had seen in childhood.
In this
manner the knowledge form substance which is permanent in past, present and
future eliminates the Mithyatva of the believer of transitoriness.
Bhavartha is
as follows- If the jiva tattva were destructible, then from the previous
knowledge the present knowledge is generated, who would be the recipient of
that? Therefore the Jiva dravya is always permanent- by such statement the
believer of transitoriness gets wise.
How is the
jiva substance? Always indestructible form the jiva dravya who is strengthened
by his own capability. Know thus only and not otherwise.
Continued….
No comments:
Post a Comment