3. The three Vyavaharas of worldly state
Nishchaya is the form of dravya while Vyavahara are its bhavas in worldly state; now these are described here:-
The Mithyadrishti jiva does not know his own nature , hence
engaged within other’s form, he believes it as his own work; engaged in these
activities he is called ashuddha Vyavahari.
The Samyaka drashti experiences his own nature by means of
indirect praman, without believing his own activities to be due to other’s
existence or other’s dependence, he contemplates of his own nature by means of
yoga ; engaged in such activities he is called Mixed Vyavahari.
The keval gyani jiva is immersed in own pure nature by means
of Yathkhyat Charitra, hence he is called as shuddha Vyavahari. Since his state
is immersed in yoga hence it is named Vyavahari. The shuddha vyavahara is
limited from 13th to 14th gunasthana. Vyavahara exists so
long as he is not siddha.
Starting from Nigod to 14th Gunasthana, all worldy
jivas can be divided in these three categories.
Large extent of the worldy jivas are Mithyadrishti only. The
Mithydrishti jiva does not know his own nature and believes ‘ activities of
body are mine’ , ‘ this raga is myself’ – in this way he remains immersed in
other forms- i.e. he manifests in the impure paryaya form only, hence he is
called ashuddha vyavahari. The Manushya etc. paryaya have been generated in
conjunction with other dravyas and actually it is not real soul nature; but
agyani believes ‘ I am Manushya’ and manifests in such form. He has been called
as ‘ Vyavahara Moodh’ ( fool believing in Vyavahara only) – Para Samaya (
remaining outside his own soul) by Acharya in Pravachansar. Brother! ‘ Manushya
Vyavahara’ is not really your vyavahara, but the manifestation within the soul
of the form of pure consciousness is the real vyavahara and your own pure
conscious paryaya is your Vyavahara. Your Vyavahara should occur in yourself or
in other dravya? Oh! Think at least that your vyavahara should occur in
yourself and others Vyavahara should happen in others- this is logical route.
Question: Vyavahara is called dependent upon others anyway ?
Answer: Here the undifferentiated is Nishchaya and differentiated
is Vyavahara in this argument. In consideration of differentiated, so long
as dependence upon others is there, till then it can be called other’s
dependent; however the bhava generated in the differentiated form is paryaya
which is generated within self only and not in others.
Soul is consciousness
form, it is not of the form of human etc. bodies. Brother! The Vyavahara of the
form of human is that of Mithyadrishti i.e. forgetting the consciousness form,
‘ I am Manushya only’ – with such spirit of body, the agyani manifests. ‘ I am
Manushya only, and this is my body only’ – this form of ego and spirit of
ownership leads one to deceive himself
which causes him to be deprived of Vyavahara of the soul of the form of
unperturbed consciousness glory only. Further on account of all the activities
pertaining to Manushya Vyavahara, he tends to indulge in raga-dwesha. For this
reason the agyani is really para-samaya ( not within himself) due to
accompaniment of other dravya form karmas. People are being lead astray in the
name of human dharma. Here saints are telling- ‘ I am Manushya’ such spirit of
delusion is really adharma. Brother! You are soul, your glory lies in conscious
form; the activities of insentient body are not your vyavahara. The impure
manifestations in the form of raga etc. are also not your vyavahara, that is
impure vyvahara only. O ignorant! What has happened to you? At least realise it
now! Your pure vyavahara is in the form of pure manifestation in
Samyak-darshan-gyan-charitra, pure consciousness form; that only is your
Vyavahara of the soul. The impure manifestation of Agyani is his ashuddha
vyavahara only.
O Jiva! What is your vyavahara and what is your nishchaya?
You do not know even this, you do not recognise your own bhavas, then how can
you practice dharma? Hence recognise your own bhavas properly first, then only
you can be benefitted.
The Samyakdrishti
experiences his knowledge-blissful form by means of indirect Praman. In the
Samyak Mati-Sruta gyans, the experience without raga, in the absence of taking
recourse to senses and mind is defined as partially direct also; however being
Mati-Sruta gyan it is called Indirect only. In respect of this further
clarification has been provided in the Rahasyapoorna Chitthi of Pandit
Todarmalji . With own experience the nature of soul has been realised,
therefore the dharmi jiva does not accept the activities of others or the form
of others to be his own. He knows his knowing nature different from them and
manifests in the activities of contemplation etc. of own nature- this is his
mixed Vyavahara.
Question: Why has it been called mixed Vyavahara?
Answer: Since the practitioner has not attained total purity
yet, in his paryaya there is some purity and some impurity- both manifest
together; hence it is called mixed Vyavahara.
Question: Mixed Vyavahara is defined from 4th to
12th gunasthana, there in 12th gunasthana there is not
even iota of impurity; even then it is called mixed ?
Answer: The impurity of the form of raga-dwesha-moha is not
there- this is true; however the knowledge etc. form qualities are in
incomplete state i.e. on account of limited knowledge ( there is fruition of
agyan bhava ) hence it has been called
mixed bhava.
Question: If this is so, then even Kevali bhagwan has
vibration due to yoga etc. hence he should also be said to be having mixed
bhava?
Answer: No, the manifestation of knowledge etc. has become
totally pure for Kevali bhagwan and the vibration due to yoga etc. is not cause
for bondage of new karmas, therefore it is called shuddha vyavahara only.
Samyakdrishti has been said to have mixed vyavahara. There
soul and body join together to act- such is not the meaning of ‘mixed’; but in the paryaya both partial purity and partial impurity are
together hence it is called mixed. In the soul after attaining Samyakdarshan in
4th gunasthana, partial purity has appeared, and upto 12th
gunasthana the practitioner state is there. Jiva with such form of
manifestations has been called Mixed Nishchaya dravya.
Question: The Samyakdrishti knows his own pure dravya, even
then why is he called shudhha-ashuddha-mixed-nishchaya dravya ?
Answer: In the Nishchaya drishti of the Samyak drishti, he
does not experience shuddha-ashuddha atma, his attention is that on shuddhatma
only; however in paryaya along with the pure parts of samyak darshan-gyan- charitra, he has
impure parts of ragas etc. also. Hence he is in mixed bhava state of shuddha
and ashuddha. Without distinguishing the
mixed bhava from the dravya , it is also called as mixed nishchaya dravya.
Observing from dravya drishti aspect, the dravya is pure only and there is no
impurity in it. It is told in Samaysar gatha 6.
If soul is observed from aspect of shuddha drishti,
then he is devoid of pramatta- apramatta (6th&7th
gunasthanas) form shuddh-ashuddha differentiations and is singular pure knower
only. And this
knowing nature which has not been corrupted is the subject of Samyak darshan.
In the paryaya there are corruptions of shuddha-ashuddha etc. When the knowing
nature is made venerable then paryaya purifies and when forgetting the nature,
if one is engaged in impurities only then paryaya becomes impure. In
conjunction with the shuddha or ashuddha paryayas the dravya has also been
called as shuddha, ashuddha or mixed; since in those periods the dravya has
also manifested in such bhavas. That manifestation belongs to dravya only and
not that of any other dravya.
Look! In practitioner state purity and impurity, both are
together in the same paryaya; even so both are different streams, the purity is
based upon shuddha dravya while impurity is based upon others- both are
different categories. In spite of being together, the impurity does not destroy
the purity appearing in the present- such mixed stream exists for the
practitioner.
In 13th-14th gunasthana, the kevali
bhagwan is engrossed in own pure soul nature only by the power of total
Yathakhyat Charitra. Although the Yathakhyat charitra was attained even in 12th
gunasthana, but there keval gyan was not existent. Now with appearance of keval gyan and infinite bliss, the desired
complete state has been realised. The objective was attained and the
obscurations have been totally removed. Therefore it is termed as pure vyvahara
of the form of pure manifestation. In 13th gunasthana under yogi
state, there is vibration of yoga, while in 14th the vibrations do
not exist; however the non-siddhatva is still there i.e. worldly state is
present, therefore the Vyavahara is present even there. Siddha bhagwan is
beyond the world hence they are beyond Vyavahara also. So long as non-Siddhatva
is there, the Vyavahara is present, while Siddha jivas are free of Vyavahara.
Although from aspect of Drishti even Samyak drishti has been called as free of
Vyavahara, but that is in context of manifestation. So long as world is
present, the Vyavahara manifestation is accepted to be present. Siddha have
been declared as free of Vyavahara. The scriptures should be understood taking
into account the view points.
In this way, the worldly jiva has impure, pure and mixed,
these three states. For every jiva proceeding to Moksha from the world, these
three states exist. The impurity has been present in ignorant state for all
worldly jivas since eternal times; later with attainment of the knowledge of
soul the practitioner form mixed state appears; and with the increase of purity
gradually the pure state appears with the appearance of keval gyan, later
Moksha state is attained shortly. The impure state is asrava-bandh tatva, in
mixed state the purity is samvar-nirjara while impurity part is asrava-bandh,
in the pure state the bhava moksha is present. The Dravya Moksha form Siddha
state has not been discussed here since here the subject is that of worldly
jivas only.
The ignorant has only impurity while from 4th
gunasthana, there is some purity along with raga- in this way mixed state
exists, in 12th gunasthana only veetragi state is there i.e. raga is
absent, however the state of knowledge etc. is incomplete, hence that too has
been called mixed bhava. For Keval gyani the knowledge etc. are complete hence
they are pure, even then in 13th -14th gunasthanas the
Siddha-hood is not there and therefore due to non-Siddha state, they are
included in Vyavahara. This is so because the relationship with the body is
present and the manifestation is accordingly present. When Siddhahood is
attained then the Vyavahara is no more applicable, and the world also does not
apply.
Question: Here
Vyavahara has been stated to be upto fourteenth gunasthana and Siddha is said
to be beyond Vyavahara, but in Samayasara etc. the Samyakdrishti has been told
to shun Vyavahara from fourth gunasthana itself ?
Answer:
Brother! There also the Vyavahara has not been rejected. But yes, it has been
told not to depend upon the Vyavahara. In any state the Vyavahara occurs and
that should be known but one should not depend upon it- this is the message
underneath. If one believes self to be benefited by Vyavahara then he would
remain tied down in the vikalpa of Vyavahara and would not be able to
experience the reality. In the Jain principles, both the nayas are practiced
and should be known as such. However the recourse should be taken of the real
nature only. Hence do not discard the knowledge of Vyavahara, but discard the
dependence and take recourse of the reality- this is the preachment.
In this way,
in the worldly state, which kind of vyavahara is practiced by any jiva, this
has been described; but it has not been told to depend upon it. Treating one
indivisible eternal dravya as worldly as well as Siddha and observing them
accordingly is also Vyavahara, but with the attention on this distinction, one
cannot attain Nirvikalpa state. Observing one single indivisible dravya nature as
the subject of contemplation is Nishchaya and with attention towards the same,
one attains Nirvikalpa state.
Question-
Whether Vyavahara is Mithyatva?
Answer: No
Brother! Vyavahara by itself is not Mithyatva. Even Gyani indulges in
Vyavahara. Here upto fourteenth gunasthana Vyavahara is said to be existent,
that Vyavahara is not Mithyatva; but if one believes Vyavahara to be beneficial
then surely it is Mithyatva.
In Samayasar
Natak it has been told that innumerable kind of Mithyatva Bhavas are Vyavahara;
and the one who has got rid of Mithyatva and attained Samyaktva, he is immersed
in Nishchaya and is free of Vyavahara. There the implication is that whatsoever
Mithyatva bhavas are existent, they are dependent upon Vyavahara in one way or
other, hence the types of Mithyatva have been stated to be same as the types of
Vyavahara; but it does not mean that whatever is vyavahara is Mithyatva . The
Samyakdrishti also indulges in Vyavahara according to his role, but his intent
is not to be dependent upon it hence he does not have Mithyatva.
Now the
three kinds of states of the Jivas in worldly state i.e. the three types of
Vyavaharas are described:
Impure
Vyavahara is of the form of shubha-ashubha conduct, the shudha-ashudha
vyavahara is conduct within self mixed with shubha upayoga; shuddha vyavahara
is conduct within self with purity. Here someone may say that the shuddha
conduct within self is present even in Siddhas hence there also it should be
called Vyavahara, but it is not so. The Vyavahara is stated to be present only
in worldly state and with the elimination of worldly state, the Vyavahara also
gets eliminated. Therefore Siddhas are said to be beyond Vyavahara.
This
completes the consideration of subject of Vyavahara.
The ignorant
indulges in ashuddha vyavahara of the form of shubha and ashubha conduct. That
shubha-ashubha conduct does not have purity. Mithyadrishti indulges in
shubha-ashubha conduct only since he does not have shuddha conduct. Someone may
say that shubha bhava is cause for shuddha bhava- but it is not so.
The shubha
conduct itself is impure – this has been told by Pandit Banarasidasji 400 years
back and the same is stated in Jain Siddhant also since eternal times. When
shubha conduct itself is impure, then how can it be cause for purity?
Therefore, the ashubha or shubha conduct of Mithyadrishti should be treated as
ashuddha vyavahara.
How is the
mixed vyavahara of the practitioner? He has conduct within self mixed with
shubha upayoga, this is shuddha-ashuddha mixed vyavahara. After attaining
Samyak darshan, from fourth gunasthana itself the conduct within self also
occurred which is part of purity while there is raga of shubha nature; this is
the impurity- in this manner the practitioner has shuddha-ashuddha vyavahara.
Question: In
fourth etc. gunasthana, the samyakdrishti indulges in ashubha bhavas also, even
then the conduct within self is called mixed with shubha. Why the subject of
ashubha was not raised?
Answer:
Ashubha is not primary as far as Samyakdrishti is concerned. Shubha is main,
hence ashubha has been ignored. In Agam the ashubha has been counted as primary
for Mithyadrishti only. For the Samyakdrishti in fourth-fifth-sixth gunasthanas
the shubhopayoga is primary , and shuddha manifestations also occur. Hence for
him the shuddha is considered to be mixed with shubha only. Look! Here this
point also came out that the shubhopayoga of samyakdrishti is ashuddha only
which is not dharma.
Question:
Here the practitioner is said to have mixed vyavahara which is mixed with
shubhopayoga, but in twelfth gunasthana above, there is no shubhopayoga, then
how is it called mixed Vyavahara ?
Answer: It
is true that there is no shubhopayoga there, but the
knowledge-vision-strength-bliss are still incomplete, hence there is audayik
agyan along with knowledge. In this context it is stated to be mixed vyavahara.
In Siddhant the fruition of agyan is stated to be upto twelfth gunasthana and
Asiddhatva form audayik bhava is there upto fourteenth
gunasthana. So long uday ( fruition) is there , the world continues and so long
as world is there, the Vyavahara is present.
Kevali
bhagwan is said to have shuddha Vyvahara. How is it ? In the form of Keval gyan along with shuddha conduct within himself the shuddha
Vyavahara exists. He is no more practitioner, and the siddha state has not been
attained either, but the objective form supremely desired Paramatma state has
been attained; hence Arihants are said to have shuddha vyavahara of the form of
shuddha conduct within themselves.
Question:
Shuddha conduct within themselves is carried out by Siddha bhagwan also, then
why they are not said to have shuddha Vvyavahara?
Answer: This
has been clarified earlier that here the topic of discussion is limited to
worldly jivas hence Vyavahara is said to be up to worldly state only. There is
Asiddhatva upto fourteenth gunasthana and quite a few karmas have vibhava form
manifestation along with karma attachment. Hence it is treated as Vyvahara till
then. In Siddha state there no vibhava or karma attachment hence it is said to
be beyond world therefore the Siddha bhagwan is said to be beyond Vyavahara.
In twelfth
gunasthana also there is Yathakhyat charitra, even then it is not termed as
shuddha vyavahara but mixed vyavahara. This point has also been clarified
earlier.
In this
manner, the worldly jivas have vyavahara of the form of worldly states. Their
nature was described in three divisions and this concludes the description of
Vyavahara. Now which form of Agam and Adhyatma bhavas are present in those
worldly jivas, is described next.
Firstly
the nature of Agam Adhyatma is described :
The
nature of a thing is called Agam and characteristics of soul are called
Adhyatma. The Agam and Adhyatma form bhavas belong to Atma dravya . Both these
bhavas are eternally present in worldly state.
Its
description- Agam form karma procedure, Adhyatma form pure consciousness
procedure.
Further
description- Karma procedure is Pudgala dravya form or bhava form; dravya form
pudgala manifestation , bhava form ashuddha manifestations of the soul in
pudgala form; both these manifestations
are established to be in Agam form.
Now
shuddha consciousness procedure is shuddha soul manifestation; this too is
dravya form or bhava form. Dravya form is manifestation of Jivatva. Bhava form
is manifestations of knowledge-vision-bliss-strength etc. infinite qualities.
Both of these are Adhyatma forms.
Both the procedures
of Agam and Adhyatma are infinite.
Here the
nature of thing should not be believed to be its eternal nature but the nature of paryaya. In
the paryaya of worldly jiva the tradition of corruption has been present since
beginingless times and the influence of its nimitta form karmas has also been
existent from beginingless time. This is described as Agam Procedure. This Agam
procedure is impure since it does not describe the soul. The Adhyatma procedure
is pure paryaya form wherein the procedure of soul is described. The Agam form ashuddha bhava and Adhyatma
form shuddha bhava- Jivas having both the bhavas exist in worldly state at all
times i.e. in worldly state, both bhavas are eternally present.
In the world,
practitioners and obstructers both types
of Jivas are always present. Only jivas having
ashuddha paryayas remain in the world and jivas with shuddha paryayas do
not exist- this is not possible. Or all the jivas have shuddha paryayas and no
jiva with ashuddha paryaya remain – this too is not possible. To summarize- The
Agam procedure with ashuddha bhava form and Adhyatma procedure with shuddha
bhava form – both the bhavas exist in the world at all times. This point should
be understood with respect to different kinds of jivas of the world. It means
that some jiva may be having shuddha paryaya and another may be having ashuddha
paryaya and another may be having mixed paryaya- both kinds of bhavas are
eternally present. However it should not be construed that these bhavas exist
in one jiva all the times, otherwise removal of impurity would not lead to
purity, or the shuddha paryaya would be eternal.
One jiva can
remove impurity from his paryaya and reveal purity, but the elimination of impure bhavas of all the jivas of the world leading to purity for
all is never possible. In the world, jivas with all types of bhavas would
always be existent. Siddhas have been there in the world since beginingless
times and nigods also have been there since beginingless times. Mithyadrishti,
Samyak drishti , ignorants and keval gyanis have been there since beginingless
times. This way all types of jivas would always be there in the world. If some
jiva thinks that the ignorance and impurities from the world can be eliminated, then it is not possible. But
yes, in his own soul he could eliminate the impurity and ignorance and reveal
keval gyan and siddha state.
Whatever
shubha-ashubha vyavahara bhava exists, it is part of Agam procedure. In Agam
procedure, bondage procedure or karma procedure- the dharma does not exist.
Dharma exists in Adhyatma procedure and that alone is Moksha marg form and that
alone is shuddha bhava form. In this
shuddha bhava form Adhyatma procedure
only, the domain of soul is described, but not in Agam procedure; since that is
not of the nature of soul but vibhava form only.
Here Agam
procedure has been stated, in that the
word Agam does not mean Siddhant form
shastras, but it should mean the tradition being followed since beginingless
time or guest bhavas. The corrupted bhavas are new guest bhavas, they do not
belong to nature of soul. Due to nimitta of karmas they have been produced
freshly in the paryaya and their tradition is continued since beginingless
time. The flow of corruption and its nimitta form karmas, have been going on
since beginingless time , and that is named Agam procedure. The revelation of pure paryaya in the jiva which is a newly
produced unprecedented spiritual state
is Adhyatma procedure. In this way, both kind of bhavas are observed in this
world. Now they are described further.
Pure
consciousness procedure i.e. pure manifestation of soul; this too is of the
form of dravya and bhava. The dravya form is Jivatva manifestation and bhava form is manifestations of
knowledge-vision-bliss-strength etc infinite qualities- both these
manifestations are Adhyatma form.
Both
procedures of Agam and Adhyatma have been continuing since beginingless time
and shall continue infinitely.
Look! This
a fine point , but after all this is the
subject of the manifestations of the Jiva. What kind of bhavas are produced in
the paryaya of jiva are being described here.
In the
manifestation of the soul, the impurities are there since beginingless time,
those are not natural bhavas but are guest impure bhavas. Those manifestations
are not of the shape of natural bhavas, that is why they are called of the
shape of pudgala; since pudgala karma is nimitta in them. The tradition of
pudgala karmas is the dravya form karma procedure and the corrupted form state
of Jiva due to their nimitta is bhava form karma procedure. In this way the
dravya and bhava karma form tradition of karma procedure is there. Both these
bhavas are described to belong to Jiva
dravya.
Question:
The tradition of dravya karma is paryaya of pudgala then why is it called bhava
of Jiva ?
Answer: It is true that it is paryaya of pudgala,
however it is related to the ashuddha bhava of the jiva. Its manifestation is
mixed with the ashuddha bhava of the jiva, hence the karma procedure has been
called as the bhava of the jiva. There are infinite paramanus in the world
which do not have any relation with the jiva, but they are not the subject of
discussion. Here the subject is that of those pudgalas which have
nimitta-naimittik relationship with the manifestation of jiva.
House-body-clothes etc. may be related to jiva sometimes and sometimes not, but
the relationship with karmas of the jiva is always there in the world. For
indicating this relationship, they have been described as bhavas of the jiva.
It should be understood accordingly.
The pure manifestations of soul substance and
its knowledge etc. qualities are of the form of Adhyatma Procedure. This
Adhyatma procedure is of the form of pure consciousness i.e. there is no
relationship with corruption or karmas. The pure manifestations
of the substance are dravya form pure consciousness procedure and the pure
manifestations of the knowledge-belief- conduct qualities are bhava form pure
consciousness procedure.
In this way
both the types of manifestations should
be known as Adhyatma form.
No comments:
Post a Comment